Answer:
The statement of cash flows should report net cash provided by financing activities of $265,000.
Explanation:
Cash Flow from Financing activites:
Common stock issued = $200,000
Dividend Payment = ($30,000)
Issuance of note payable = $45,000
Issuance of Bond = <u> $50,000 </u>
Net cash flow = <u>265,000</u>
The statement of cash flows should report net cash provided by financing activities of $265,000.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Capital contribution by David = $40,000
Interest of David in partnership = 
Total capital of the partnership after the admission of new partner:
= 
= $200,000
Total capital of partnership before decreasing of obsolete inventory:
= $140,000 + $40,000 + $40,000
= $220,000
Therefore, value of decrease in inventory:
= Total capital before decrease - Total capital after decrease
= $220,000 - $200,000
= $20,000
The reduction in value of inventory will be distributed in old partners in ratio of 3:1
Hence,
Capital balance of Allen after admission of David:
= 
= $125,000
Capital balance of Daniel after admission of David:
= 
= $35,000
<u>Explanation:</u>
One may ask: what is a credit card? In simple words, a credit card is a payment instrument (plastic card) that allows the cardholder to spend money they don't personally own in their account.
Hence, A typical credit card statement would inform me that I made a purchase worth $500, stating
- The Payment Due Date: For example, it may be written that I must have made the credit balance by 31/12/XX. (Note, Failure to do so would in most cases lead to accruing of interest)
- The Minimum payment due: In this case, the $20 signifies a minimum payment that is significant enough to be recorded till the entire $500 balance is covered. However, it is not intended that only that amount be paid each month. If it were to be it would take me 25 months or 2 years 1 month ($500/$20) to complete the balance; which is not the best option likely considering the accrued interest to be paid.
Answer:
d.mitigating
Explanation:
This is a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor is a fact of relevance as it can reveal the motivations of the crime. Although not sufficient to absorb the defendant, except in cases of self-defense, when there is evidence of mitigating factors, this can be used to soften a defendant's penalty if it is proven that the motive for the crime was not misleading. A good example is the case in which the defendant committed a murder, and he was sentenced to death, but there is a mitigating factor: the defendant suffered physical abuse for years and killed his attacker. The jury can understand that the defendant committed the crime due to the suffering caused by the victim, which would be different from a crime motivated by trite motives. Thus, the death penalty can be understood as disproportionate and it can be reversed to a less severe penalty.
