1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VladimirAG [237]
3 years ago
14

A wide plain is also known as a llano. True False

History
2 answers:
Volgvan3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

as for my answer is TRUE..

erastova [34]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Its true

Explanation:

You might be interested in
- How did Japanese government change after Minamoto Yoritomo came to power in 1185?
Alla [95]

Answer:

it changed because the fire nation attacked, naw im just kidding, the real reason is becasue the government changed, and  the warrior class began to run the country.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the space below, write a claim in which you respond to
Georgia [21]

Answer:

The Renaissance has the meaning of reviving, reviving and reviving ancient Greek and Roman cultures lost after a long period of harsh, authoritarian domination of the Catholic church, medieval

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Constitution allow Slavery?<br><br> Please answer ASAP!!!
mars1129 [50]

Question- Why did the Constitution allow Slavery?

Answer- On Monday, Senator Bernie Sanders told his audience at Liberty University that the United States “in many ways was created” as a nation “from way back on racist principles.” Not everyone agreed. The historian Sean Wilentz took to The New York Times to write that Bernie Sanders—and a lot of his colleagues—have it all wrong about the founding of the United States. The Constitution that protected slavery for three generations, until a devastating war and a constitutional amendment changed the game, was actually antislavery because it didn’t explicitly recognize “property in humans.” Lincoln certainly said so, and cited the same passage from Madison’s notes that Wilentz used. But does that make it so? And does it gainsay Sanders’s inelegant but apparently necessary voicing of what ought to be obvious, what David Brion Davis, Wilentz’s scholarly mentor and my own, wrote back in 1966—that the nation was “in many ways” founded on racial slavery? If the absence of an ironclad guarantee of a right to property in men really “quashed” the slaveholders, it should be apparent in the rest of the document, by which the nation was actually governed. But of the 11 clauses in the Constitution that deal with or have policy implications for slavery, 10 protect slave property and the powers of masters. Only one, the international slave-trade clause, points to a possible future power by which, after 20 years, slavery might be curtailed—and it didn’t work out that way at all. The three-fifths clause, which states that three-fifths of “all other persons” (i.e. slaves) will be counted for both taxation and representation, was a major boon to the slave states. This is well known; it’s astounding to see Wilentz try to pooh-pooh it. No, it wasn’t counting five-fifths, but counting 60 percent of slaves added enormously to slave-state power in the formative years of the republic. By 1800, northern critics called this phenomenon “the slave power” and called for its repeal. With the aid of the second article of the Constitution, which numbered presidential electors by adding the number of representatives in the House to the number of senators, the three-fifths clause enabled the elections of plantation masters Jefferson in 1800 and Polk in 1844. Just as importantly, the tax liability for three-fifths of the slaves turned out to mean nothing. Sure the federal government could pass a head tax, but it almost never did. It hardly could when the taxes had to emerge from the House, where the South was 60 percent overrepresented. So the South gained political power, without having to surrender much of anything in exchange. Indeed, all the powers delegated to the House—that is, the most democratic aspects of the Constitution—were disproportionately affected by what critics quickly came to call “slave representation.” These included the commerce clause—a compromise measure that gave the federal government power to regulate commerce, but only at the price of giving disproportionate power to slave states. And as if that wasn’t enough, Congress was forbidden from passing export duties—at a time when most of the value of what the U.S. exported lay in slave-grown commodities. This was one of the few things (in addition to regulating the slave trade for 20 years) that Congress was forbidden to do. Slavery and democracy in the U.S. were joined at the 60-percent-replaced hip. Another clause in Article I allowed Congress to mobilize “the Militia” to “suppress insurrections”—again, the House with its disproportionate votes would decide whether a slave rebellion counted as an insurrection. Wilentz repeats the old saw that with the rise of the northwest, the slave power’s real bastion was the Senate. Hence the battles over the admission of slave and free states that punctuated the path to Civil War. But this reads history backwards from the 1850s, not forward from 1787.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did US train travel change by 1870? People could finally travel by train to
Julli [10]

Answer:

People could finally travel by train across the entire country.

Explanation:

US railway services by 1870 had undergone a great amount of development. This form of transport was becoming more popular as it helped in the movement of people and heavy goods such as agricultural products in bulk.

People could finally travel by train across the entire country due to rail roads being present in all states of the country.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how often congress reapportion its membership and how such reapportionment can affect the reelection of incumbent member
ANEK [815]

By laws of the U.S. Constitution, the federal government is required to carry on a census <u>every 10 years</u> that calculates how many people are currently living in each state. Occasionally, as the population goes up or down in certain states, a <u>reapportionment of U.S. House seats must be done in order to adjust to the changes.</u>

<u>Re-election rates</u> for incumbent members of the congress has always been extremely high. <u>Historically, it has rarely gone down 90%</u>. However, for States that experience slow growth or rapid loss of population, the threat of losing seats becomes an actual concern for congress members.


Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The land ordinance of 1787 was also known as the _____ ordinance.
    13·2 answers
  • Explain the differences between the use of hydroelectric energy and coal.
    11·2 answers
  • How do you write a sentence using the word recall
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Congress pass the Tariff of 1816?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone organize these rocks from Oldest to Youngest as in which formed first.
    13·1 answer
  • What happened in chappaquiddick?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the military dictatorships crack down on workers, students, and native peoples?
    11·1 answer
  • How was society under the tokugawa shogunate organized
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Nuremberg trails were necessary?
    9·1 answer
  • What do you think is the most preferred model of communication? How will you be guided in order to achieve the end-goal of commu
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!