Answer:
Shays' Rebellion, 1786-1787.
Chisholm v Georgia 1793.
Whiskey Rebellion, 1794.
Marbury v Madison 1803.
McCulloch v Maryland 1819.
Nullification, 1832.
Scott v Sandford , 1857.
The Confederacy, 1860-1865.
Here are a few hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Following the death of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, who was born in Nepal near the northern border of India, his followers began to share his teachings by traveling first to India and later along the Silk Road from China to the Mediterranean. An Indian emperor named Ashoka was among the most passionate Buddhists to spread the religion
The hardest part would be defining national security. Journalist's want to protect their source in order for the source to feel secure and not put in harm's way.
I think many journalists take advantage even when the source doesn't require protection.
How do you distinguish between the two?
I agree that for the sake of security and even solving vicious crimes, they need to reveal the source and also the source needs some form of protection.
When including the public in any reveals, they must be absolutely sure.
We, the people, have the right to information, however; the timing of the release is critical.
We live in different times. Our enemies are both inside and out of our country.
Not sure exactly what it was, but I think it was proposed by John Locke.
Hope I could help!