Answer:
Protected- paitents health insurance info, court ordered health info, medical records, health care bill , A paitent Dies A child is being abused, PAitents testd positive for HIVS, baby is born to paitient
Exempt- paitent says she feels depressed
Explanation:
I believe that is correct.
Answer:
A. Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses
The First Amendment provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” These two clauses are referred to as the “establishment clause” and the “free exercise clause.” As with that part of the First Amendment which protects freedom of speech, both of these clauses have been applied to the states, and therefore operate against all levels of government in the United States. The free exercise clause protects the religious beliefs, and to a certain extent, the religious practices of all citizens. The more controversial establishment clause prohibits the government from endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities.
Both clauses protect the same values, and often a violation of one would also be a violation of the other. For example, mandatory prayer in schools would constitute an improper establishment of religion and would also interfere with the free exercise rights of those students who did not believe in that particular prayer or prayer in general.
Explanation:
Answer:
It's <em>B. Conciliation </em>
<em />
Explanation:
It has as much influence as you allow it to. Imo it’s good to establish a flexible set of beliefs before seeing what others think so that you can be prepared without others having influence on it. However, I remember keep these beliefs flexible because you never know when you might change them and they should always be changing :)
Hope this helps!
Answer: Contributory negligence is a complete defense against a tort case which is based on a negligence claim. The defendant would have to prove that the plaintiff contributed to its own injuries or damage in the case. If proven, the plaintiff is totally barred from any type of recovery. As this type of defense can be very unfair. Most jurisdictions use comparative negligence where only the plaintiff’s actual percentage of fault is subtracted from the damages the plaintiff can recover from the defendant.
Explanation: