Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States.
Explanation:
Pursuant to the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction implies that the Supreme Court is the first and only court entitled to hear a case. However, the Constitution limits this power and the court deals with cases involving disputes between states or controversies among ambassadors or other ministers. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the fact that the court has the authority to review judgments passed by lower courts. Frequently, the Supreme Court hears the cases that have already been decided by any US Court of Appeals.
If a person is not satisfied with a decision/ruling made by a district court, he/she may appeal such decision. The case is then reviewed by a Court of Appeals. After the appellate court has pronounced judgment, the ruling may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Under the U.S. Constitution, there's no set time for a speedy trial. Therefore, when a defendant claims a violation, the court applies a “balancing test,” assessing: the length of the delay. the reason for it.
Answer: The form of U.S. tax-free organizing under section 527 of the US Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 527) is a 527 association or 527 community. A 527 party is formed with the primary goal of influencing candidate selection, candidacy, voting, appointment, or loss for federal, state, or local public office.
After the case <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> established that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court mandated that all schools be desegregated. However, it was not clear how this was to be done. Eventually, in <em>Brown II</em>, the Court asked that desegregation be carried out "with all deliberate speed."
Many people criticized this order as too ambiguous. The criticism appears to have been fair, as it seems to have allowed Southern states to avoid integration for years. Many school districts resisted, delayed or avoided significant integration through various strategies, and the Court was unable to enforce a clear action. Therefore, the implementation of the Supreme Court order was not very successful.
