Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
D, it’s shows the jury individually. It shows that they have families and other things to do not as a collective, but as individuals. Hope this helps, have a nice day! =)
Answer:
Sound effects
Explanation:
examples such as: Boom! Splash, Whack!
Some forms of onomatopoeia can be put in a sentence.
The man hit the ball with a loud whack.
Even though it isn't expressed with an exclamation point of feeling, the term "Whack" was used and its a form of sound.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
it describes the verb with ing, and doesnt have because in it.
