Answer:
Everyday citizens put pressure on the government.
Explanation:
Everyday citizens have played an important role in the fight to win civil rights for marginalized groups in the United States of America because every citizen put pressure on the government to accept their opinion if all the citizens strikes against the government.
The citizens have to block the roads and closed the shops until their demands are accepted of giving civil rights to marginalized groups. In this way the government accept their demands.
It is very effective when everyday citizens have been in securing equal rights for these groups because the government does not destroy their image and country's economy by rejecting their demands and it will accept their demands.
Answer:
Antitrust laws also referred to as competition laws, are statutes developed by the U.S. government to protect consumers from predatory business practices. They ensure that fair competition exists in an open-market economy.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, I am sorry if it doesn't
Answer:
United States President Ronald Reagan delivers a speech at the Berlin Wall in June 1987, in which he called for Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev to "Tear Down This Wall!".
Explanation:
Answer:
the belief that people's loyalty shouldn't be to a king or empire, but to their own nation. How did nationalism increase tensions among European nations? It increased power among the European nations. ... European colonies competed for colonies in Asia and Africa.
Explanation:
Answer:
Rhetorical analysis has seen a sort of revival in recent decades, after a long period of disuse. From the times of ancient Greece until the beginning of the modern era, rhetoric was considered a major tool for creating effective and esthetically appealing discourse. With the advent of modern thinking, however, rationality and a scientific definition of the ideas of "truth" and "empirical proof" displaced the idea of a constructed argumentation. It has only been since scientific truths themselves have been "relative-ized", at first through notions like "paradigms," and later through the introduction of concepts and tools such as "deconstruction" that analysts have again begun to consider the importance of a discipline related to the formal construction of argumentative techniques. But the revival is not exactly a new event. About 50 years have passed since PERELMAN and OLBRECHTS-TYTECA first published their "Traité de l'argumentation" (The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation). If rhetoric was ignored for so long it was because it became associated with manuals for florid but empty discourse, partly because modern belief in scientific discourse could not be placed in doubt. "Rhetoric" was defined as insincere, and pompous bombast. At the present time, however, rhetoric is seen in another light. It has become a tool for studies in philosophy, law, linguistics, literature, and in relation to mass communication and political practices. (1988) have been particularly eloquent with regard to the use of rhetoric for psychological, sociological, and political analysis
Explanation:
