On the continental expansion, Americans pushed Native Americans off their land making deals with them that favored the US more than the tribes. After that, Americans pushed their ideas to the areas being developed trying to make Native Americans abandon their own culture.
On the expansionism overseas the US returned the land to its original inhabitants, this happened in Cuba for example. This was the main difference between expansionism inside and outside the US.
The taking of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines was a violation of fundamental American ideals of self-government and democracy, this was actually the main argument of Anti-Imperialists. Once the US had claimed the territory they established their own rule and define role/impact in each respective country. Conquering other territories and forcing them to abide by American ideals and culture goes against the idea of American freedom.
Answer:
Focus
Explanation:
I think sorry if its wrong
58 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
He meant the culture was open to change.
And in fact did change it a great deal, though less than he had hoped.
Having visited both China and Japan, traditional religion has a grip on minds in Japan, but not China.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the fourth choice "Imperialism"
Imperialism, in a broad sense, is a political theory where a country (usually an empire or kingdom) extends its power by acquisition of territories. It may also include the exploitation of those territories which is similar to colonialism which is generally regarded as an expression ofimperialism<span>.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
