1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
3 years ago
7

Panu nakaka apekto ang gaylingo sa talasalitaan o bokabularyo?​

History
1 answer:
Alika [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Excuse me sorry but i tried but got a wrong translation sorry

You might be interested in
Select the best definition for Justice. Select one:
Murljashka [212]
I think the answer is d
8 0
3 years ago
What is interesting about the pings that were sent to the european website?
galina1969 [7]
What is interesting about the pings that were sent to the European website is thatthey never<span>received a response, so they timed out</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
What dangers were these child workers exposed to?
vagabundo [1.1K]

The dangers that the child workers were exposed to are:

  • The kids are dressed in flowy clothes.
  • The youngsters are exposed to harmful equipment.
  • There is no safety equipment on the children.

<h3>What does the term "child workers" mean?</h3>

Child labor is the term used to describe the exploitation of children through any sort of work that robs them of their youth, prevents them from attending regular school, and is bad for their mental, physical, social, and moral development.

Therefore, Work that robs children of their childhood, their potential, and their dignity and is detrimental to their physical and mental development is frequently referred to as "child labor." just as seen in the photo.

Learn more about child workers from

brainly.com/question/14458814
#SPJ1

See full question below

Look at the photo. What dangers were these child workers exposed to?

4 0
1 year ago
Why did the Indians want a federal court in Indian Territory?
zalisa [80]
They didn't want to travel far to get to the court.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the type of government England had in the period before Restoration?
    15·1 answer
  • Define globalization
    9·2 answers
  • The three major areas of professional careers are
    10·2 answers
  • Why is Iwo Jima considered one of the bloodiest battles that occurred on the Pacific front?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did cities develop along Georgia’s fall line?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did technology make it difficult for armies on the western front to mount successful offensive attack ?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT an African good traded in exchange for European goods?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did states with smaller populations object to the legislation proposed in the Virginia Plan?
    10·1 answer
  • I still need help!!!
    7·1 answer
  • ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⠀⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣯⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⢿⣷⡄⠀ ⠀⠀⣀⣤⣴⣶⣶⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣷⠀ ⠀⢰⣿⡟⠋⠉⣹⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!