Answer;
<span>European nations would have gotten more of a foothold in China.
</span>
If the imperial dynasty had continued to rule China, it is most likely that European nations would have gotten more of a foothold in China.
<span>Chinese civilization is one of the world’s oldest continuous civilizations. The three major Dynasties that stood above the rest were;
</span>-The Han Dynasty that ruled from 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E.
<span>It was able to maintain its bureaucracy and military through a more efficient and thorough system of taxation than many contemporary empires.
-The Tan Dynasty ruled China from 618 to 907 C.E.
- The Qing Dynasty, it was China's last and one of its greatest dynasties, ruling from 1644 to 1911.</span>
The Precambrian eon is separated from the Phanerozoic eon in the fossil record because of poorer record of fossils than that of the succeeding Phanerozoic eon.This is because many Precambrian rocks have been heavily metamorphosed,obscuring their origins,while others have been destroyed by erosion,or remain deeply buried beneath Phanerozoic strata.The Phanerozoic Eon covers 541 years to the present while Precambrian Eon covers 4.6 billion years.
Answer:
The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>
Here is another argument
While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>
Explanation:
It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.
A good resource person to go to when asking help in conducting research is "<span>C. librarian." Librarians are often trained to know exactly where to look for certain research, while there is a lot of false information on the Internet.</span>
Answer:
The theme is the risk-return relationship. generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. diversification enables you to reduce the risk of your portfolio without sacrificing potential returns.
Explanation:
Have a good day!!
