Answer: He greatly supported the Confederacy, meaning that Texas joined their side during the Civil War.
Explanation:
After he was elected governor of Texas in 1861, Lubbock took steps to increase Texas' miltary strength. He greatly supported the draft imposed by the Confederacy of able-(white) men, going as far as to oppose or deny conscription excemptions, recomending white cattle ranchers to use slaves in order to free up white workers who could be conscripted and incorporated into the Confederate army. He also set out to build military facilities and factories in Texas to aid in the war effort against the Union. He organized Civil Courts not recognized as legitimate, imprisoning or linching suspected Union supporters in Texas. After the end of his term as governor, he joined the Confederate army as Liutenant Colonel.
The supporter of the Progressive would most support the government policy that is forcing business owners to make workplaces safer. Thus option (A) is correct.
<h3>
What is Progressive Movement?</h3>
Progressive Movement is also termed as Progressive Era which the time frame between 1890 to 1920 where many social and political reform took place.
It was aimed for the betterment of the society. It was basically meant to counter the effects of the industrialization and to eliminate the unfair practices in the business.
The government policy requiring business owners to make workplaces safer would receive the strongest support from a Progressive Era. As a result, choice (A) is right.
Learn more about Progressive Movement here:
brainly.com/question/11704287
#SPJ1
Answer: Federalists vs. Antifederalists
Explanation:
I think it is the third one. Because it is not the first two because Jonathan Edwards preached the sermon "sinners in the hands of an angry God" and he practically read it word for word and was calm, however it was very powerful and convicting so the people did cry. And I do believe Whitfield was passionate and powerful because he did create an awakening with his evangelizing. So third one.
:)
The right to bear arms is not the whole thing. In fact if you read it it is quite self explanatory. The second amendment states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." So the right to bear arms is so we can have a well organized militia.
