Answer:
Mark me as brainlist
Explanation:
The original Constitution of 1788 contained very few specific restrictions on the ways in which the power of the national government could be exercised against the people. It guaranteed the right to trial by jury in criminal (but not civil) cases, placed limits on prosecutions and punishments for treason, forbade bills of attainder (laws aimed at particular persons) and ex post facto laws (laws that punished conduct that was legal when it happened), limited any restrictions on habeas corpus to certain designated emergencies, and prohibited the granting of titles of nobility. But the Constitution that emerged from the 1787 Constitutional Convention contained nothing like a comprehensive bill of rights. Most state constitutions of the time had bills of rights, and many citizens—and members of the Constitutional Convention—expected the new national constitution to have one as well. Nonetheless, the state delegations at the Constitutional Convention voted 10-0 against including a bill of rights in the Constitution.
In my opinion, working directly with the offenders and victims are more important rather than doing crime-related research, because working with them helps us understand them better on how they act and reason towards dealing with their personal respective feelings.
I hope it somehow helps you
Answer:
The purpose of criminal justice is to help those who have committed crimes to be able to have the right to rehabilitate for their actions and overall to become a better indvidual. It is effective as it offers moral support and educates offenders to become a better version of themselves. Punishment isn't an effective way of helping a criminal reform as it may increase the occurence of further crimes.
That’s why the organize it by putting warnings on the media before looking at it so people can choose to watch it or not so it really depends on the person and their opinion on it depending what it is
Answer:
drinking and driving and falling asleep
Explanation: