1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pav-90 [236]
3 years ago
7

I think that making students wear school uniforms is unfair because they don't do anything for us except keep us from growing up

. School uniforms don't help the kids who have trouble with other kids because of their clothing. There will always be these challenges no matter what a student wears. So why should we wear uniforms if they don't help anybody?
People say that uniforms make schools nicer and safer. How does it do that? Students can still get into conflicts with one another. Principals can help us prevent them in other ways. They should not take our pride away by giving us uniforms.
People that enforce these things must think that we don't want to have a life and that we do not need to be individuals. We need to be able to wear what we want to wear. By giving us uniforms, they are hurting students more than they are helping them. This is what I think about school uniforms.
7
Which line should be omitted from this persuasive paper?
A.
"So why should we wear uniforms if they don't help anybody?"
B.
"Principals can help us prevent them in other ways."
C.
"This is what I think about school uniforms."
D.
"There will always be these challenges no matter what a student wears."
English
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In my opinion, you should omit A.

You might be interested in
1) Which statement best describes the rhyming structure of this poem?
Naddik [55]

Answer:

The First two and last two of each stanza rhyme.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
2. I believe i can deepen.my understanding through
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

ok?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What type of incorrect modifier is in the following sentence?
ryzh [129]

Answer:

Dangling Modifier

Explanation:

In the incorrect sentence, ''climbing up the ladder carefully, the frightened cat was brought down from the tree''. The reader is left wondering who climbed up the ladder carefully, to bring the cat down from the tree. The writer must tell the reader!

5 0
3 years ago
Proofread the following extracts and correct any errors in verb tenses.
blagie [28]
1- <span>The ancient Chinese board game “Go” is invented long before there was any writing to record its rules. A game from the impossibly distant past has now brought us closer to a moment that once seemed part of an impossibly distant future: a time when machines are cleverer than we are.

<u>Because it's an action that started and finished in the past, this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past)</u>

2- </span><span>For years, Go was considered the last redoubt against the march of computers. Machines might win at chess, draughts, Othello, three-dimensional noughts and crosses, Monopoly, bridge, and poker. Go, though, is different.

<u>This continues the same line of mistake as the first paragraph. Because it's referencing something that already happened ("Go was considered...), this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past).</u>

The game required intuition, strategising <u>and</u> character reading, along with vast numbers of moves and permutations. According to legend, it was invented by a Chinese emperor to teach his subjects balance and patience: qualities unique to human intelligence.

<u>The conjunction and is used before the last element in a list. In this case, this word should be substituted by a comma because <em>character reading</em> is not the last element on that list.</u>

3- </span><span>This week, though, a computer called Alpha Go <u>defeats</u> the world’s best player of Go. It did so by “ learning” the game, crunching through 30 million positions from recorded matches, reacting and anticipating. It <u>evolves</u> as a player and taught itself.

That single game of Go marks a milestone on the road to the “technological singularity”, the moment when artificial intelligence becomes capable of self-improvement and learns faster than humans can control or understand.</span><span>

<u>These should read defeated ... evolved. This continues the same line of thought on subject-verb agreement. If it's talking about a past event, and the rest of the paragraph sustains that idea, then these verbs should be in Simple Past.</u></span><span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Parallel structure may be corrected by splitting infinitives. True Or False
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

There are times that you can achieve parallel structure through using an infinitive.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to this entry, what part of speech is the word “defalcation”?
    14·1 answer
  • Which best explains the function of the dashes that end lines 4 and 6
    8·2 answers
  • What motivates Tybalt to try to confront Romeo at the Capulets’ party?
    15·1 answer
  • She had borne, that morning, all that nature could endure; and as her temperament was not of the order that escapes from too int
    10·2 answers
  • Why are books disputed and sometimes even banned?
    6·1 answer
  • What does integers mean?
    9·2 answers
  • Dyes and Latex both have the same symptoms for those that have sensitivity to them. Identify the symptoms they share.
    7·2 answers
  • 15 POINTS!!
    8·2 answers
  • 9.) How does the repetition affect the song, “Rise Up”? Select the two BEST
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me please
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!