Answer:
Explanation:
El liberalismo tiene varias características que lo diferencian de otras corrientes de pensamiento. Una de ellas es que defiende a toda costa la libertad del individuo como base para una sociedad en progreso. A su vez, esto se ejecuta mediante un marco jurídico que reconozca a todas las personas como iguales con los mismos derechos y deberes. Por otro lado, el liberalismo promueve la división de poderes del Estado, ya que consideran que es la manera idónea para limitar un gobierno.
Otra de las características del liberalismo es que promueve el debate público como forma de resolución de los problemas de una sociedad. Esto permite que cada persona pueda aportar sus ideas y al final se llegue a una conclusión en común. Asimismo, la propiedad individual es estimulada como la manera para que cada quien se esfuerce para tener sus bienes propios. Por ende, no tendrán el riesgo de que puedan ser perseguidos o expropiados por un gobierno opresor.
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
So you wanna know how the benefits where bad or good? or is it something else you wanna know?
Answer:The Aftermath of World War I saw drastic political, cultural, economic, and social change across World War It also had the effect of bringing political transformation
Explanation:
Hi, In 1878 Anthony and Stanton arranged for Congress to be presented with an amendment giving women the right to vote.
