Answer:
a is 1.
b. is 2.
and c is 3.
BTW, this is not a guess.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The conditions differ between North American plantations and that of Caribbean plantations in many ways. This includes:
1. Slaves in North American plantations have little or no chance of freedom. Slaves in the Caribbean plantation has a better chance of freedom
2. There are lesser death rates in North American plantations compared to the Caribbean plantations
3. Slaves in North American plantations gave birth more compared to those in Caribbean plantations.
4. Each of North American plantations has fewer slaves compared to those of Caribbean plantations
5. There is a higher tolerance of racial mixing in Caribbean plantations compared to North Americans.
Answer:
1. The Nazis created a terror-state. This was achieved through intimidation and brutality. Those living in Germany were too scared to disobey Nazi laws.
Hitler used a number of organizations to uphold and extend his control of Germany.
2. The Nazis tried to make Germany self-sufficient - that is to produce all the goods it needed without having to rely on imported supplies. They called this policy 'Autarky'. The Nazis implemented a major programme of public works, such as building and repairing roads, railways and houses
3. I cant figure out this one
4. Attempts at modifying public opinions, attitudes, and beliefs range from advertising and schooling to “brainwashing.” Their effectiveness is highly controversial. We demonstrate that Nazi indoctrination––with its singular focus on fostering racial hatred––was highly effective. Germans who grew up under the Nazi regime are much more anti-Semitic today than those born before or after that period. These findings demonstrate that beliefs can be modified massively through policy intervention. We also show that it was probably Nazi schooling that was most effective, and not radio or cinema propaganda. Where schooling could tap into preexisting prejudices, indoctrination was particularly strong. This suggests that confirmation bias may play an important role in intensifying attitudes toward minorities.
5. I dont know sorry!
Explanation:
Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
<span>a progressive Republican social reform.
</span>
