I would say the last statement is true and I agree that Julius Cesar was a good man as he made reforms that were good for the poor and taxed the rich more than the poor and controlled the rents of the rich for the poor and was also a fighter in war who fought alongside his men and a great military strategist but also distributed conquered lands to his soldiers ie treating them with appreciation.
Hey there! I believe your answer is A. The rest of my life would be endurable if I had a pair of those white, calf-high confections with little black heels. Hope this helped!
Thanks!
~Steve
Answer:
Explained Below
Explanation:
Ethical egoism propagates that moral conduct should be judged only by self interest. It provides ideal results for the individual without any thought for the people getting affected by it or due to its consequences. It is considered ethical as it benefits the person with no emphasis on its consequence to other people affected by the egoism.
Utilitarianism primarily focuses on collective growth and betterment. Morality is judged when it provides larger benefits to the entire community than just an individual. It views a conduct to be ethically correct if provides greater good for people. Lesser harm to people along with everyone's interest in consideration.
Both ethical egoism and utilitarianism differ in its approach and results driven out of it.
