The given case involves c. both a state and a federal discrimination claim.
<h3>What is a Discrimination Claim?</h3>
This refers to the allegations that are leveled by an employee against his employer about job discrimination based on factors such as immigration status, national origin, etc.
Hence, we can see that in a discrimination claim, if the laws are the same, then a judge can make a decision and apply it to both federal and state claims.
With this in mind, we can see that because Rapunzel who lives in Massachusetts files a discrimination claim against her employer, this is both a federal and state claim because it happened in Massachusetts and she had exhausted her administrative remedies.
This leads to the consideration of the courts to file her claim as this can be arrived at based on the question of A. whether the case can be tried in federal court and which courts have personal jurisdiction over Rapunzel.
Read more about discrimination claims here:
brainly.com/question/5987026
The answer is electronic monitoring.
In corporations, it is not uncommon to find this policy. What it means is that every single Internet activity that you choose to engage in while using the company’s electronic equipment and Internet connection would be recorded by the company. The purpose of this policy is to discourage employees from using company resources for personal gains.
Answer:
<u>A. Plans for making commodities available for sale or trade</u>
Explanation:
- As a market is a place where all the goods and commodities are brought for sale the products and services that exist in the market or on the market are those that brought for the consumption by the people.
- This involves the plans for buying and selling in the market to get a good amount of returns. Off the market means the properties that are for sale but are not available for the purchase. Hence the products are based on the availability of the market conditions.