Answer:
World human population is expected to reach upwards of 9 billion by 2050 and then level off over the next half-century. How can the transition to a stabilizing population also be a transition to sustainability? How can science and technology help to ensure that human needs are met while the planet's environment is nurtured and restored?
Our Common Journey examines these momentous questions to draw strategic connections between scientific research, technological development, and societies' efforts to achieve environmentally sustainable improvements in human well being. The book argues that societies should approach sustainable development not as a destination but as an ongoing, adaptive learning process. Speaking to the next two generations, it proposes a strategy for using scientific and technical knowledge to better inform future action in the areas of fertility reduction, urban systems, agricultural production, energy and materials use, ecosystem restoration and biodiversity conservation, and suggests an approach for building a new research agenda for sustainability science.
Our Common Journey documents large-scale historical currents of social and environmental change and reviews methods for "what if" analysis of possible future development pathways and their implications for sustainability. The book also identifies the greatest threats to sustainability—in areas such as human settlements, agriculture, industry, and energy—and explores the most promising opportunities for circumventing or mitigating these threats. It goes on to discuss what indicators of change, from children's birth-weights to atmosphere chemistry, will be most useful in monitoring a transition to sustainability.
Answer:
The physical features determine weather or not you can trade with a certain country
Explanation:
If a country is surrounded by water, then it makes it easy to trade with other countries, positively impacting the economy, but if it is surrounded by mountains, then it is a lot harder to trade with.
Answer:
There is actually a couple, so i'll give you all, you can probably just put the first 6
Explanation:
1. Russian
2. German
3. French
4. English
5. Turkish
6. Italian
7. Spanish
8. Ukrainian
Explanation: They both study and address environmental issues. The ultimate goal of both, and the similarity between them, is to improve the environment as a place of life for each of us. In both cases, meaning similarity, the role of man in improving the living environment is emphasised. The scientific approach reveals and gathers significant scientific facts and knowledge that can again be used by various environmental activists in protection of the environment in terms of both prevention and restoration of polluted natural resources.
The difference between them is that environmental science uses scientific methods to study the environment, and it can be said that they use an objective scientific approach to this problem. Environmentalists, on the other hand, use a wider range of ways to deal with this problem, often with an emotional and biased approach. Environmentalists take a wide variety of actions, which of course are not just scientific, in the pursuit of environmental improvements, living conditions. So environmental science is looking for knowledge on this subject, such as human interaction with nature and vice versa pointing it only to scientific facts within the institutions intended for such a thing. Again, on the other hand, environmentalists often have political appearances on this issue, and then they often perform dramatically in order to point out in important political places human impact on the environment, which can be detrimental to it and ultimately pernicious to the people themselves. So environmentalism can be said to be a kind of social concern for the environment and people, while environmental science about the environment with only scientific facts, and with that knowledge collected, emphasises the importance of environmental sustainability.
