Flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
<h3>What are secondary catastrophic effects?</h3>
Secondary effects are indirectly associated with the occurrence of a catastrophic event (in this case, a earthquake).
Moreover, direct damage makes reference to eventual immediate effects that such catastrophic events may have.
In conclusion, flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
Learn more about immediate catastrophic effects here:
brainly.com/question/7413514
#SPJ1
<span>The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "D. Tundra." This ecosystem is common in eastern and northern Siberia. Flora include mosses, summer flowers, and small shrubs. Animals include wolves, reindeer, foxes, and rabbits. The ecosystems that is described in the paragraph above is the tundra.</span>
This is due to the amount of infrastructure in the city. All that metal holds heat making inside the city hotter than outside the city.
Well first off the founders, any amending documentation, and input by the civilian population. From there they can grow, fall, adapt, or die. In seemingly infinite ways the gov. or population can be changed.
Answer:
In cities due to high population and presence of more services.
Explanation:
Most shopping malls are present on that location where human population is higher such as cities and towns because people are the customers who bought the products present in these malls. The owners of malls built malls in the cities due to the presence of high population of peoples in order to sale more products to the people and earn high profit. these malls also built in cities due to the presence of services such as electricity and water etc.
