This is Mrs White. She is a primary school teacher.
She teaches English, Maths and Geography.
At the moment, she teaches Maths.
She lives in London and is married to Georges, who is French. They have three children. They
all love animals, but they do not have any pets
because they live in an apartment. Mrs White speaks French as well as English, but she does not teach it. Mrs White's niece Sophie stays with the Whites for a few days. Sophie
lives and studies in Liverpool.
Answer:
A. anecdotal, because it tells a narrative about enslaved people taking action for basic human rights.
Explanation:
Passage:
<em>The seeds for this system were sown in 1823 in the sugar colony of British Guiana—now Guyana—where John Gladstone, father of the future British prime minister William Gladstone, owned over a thousand slaves. John Smith, a young and idealistic English preacher who had recently come to the area, was becoming popular with those slaves. His inspiring sermons retold the story of Moses leading the Jews out of Egypt and to freedom. The sugar workers listened and understood: Smith was speaking not about the Bible, but about the present. That summer, after hearing one of Smith’s sermons, over three thousand slaves grabbed their machetes, their long poles, and rose up against their masters. The governor of the colony rushed toward the burning plantations, where he met a group of armed slaves, and asked them what they wanted.</em>
<em />
<em>"Our rights," came the reply. Here was Haiti—and for that matter America and France—all over again. The slaves insisted they were not property; like the Jews in Egypt, they were God's children, who were owed their basic human rights.</em>
This is a narrative.
Answer:Which type of argument does Keeler use in this passage from "Thanksgiving: A Native American View" ? -This is an emotional argument, because she wants readers to be angry at the Pilgrims for mistreating the American Indians. -This is an emotional appeal that tries to persuade people to be heroes who overcome evil.May 3, 2017
Explanation:
The narrator gives the reader no clue as to who is saying which thing or who the instigator of the conversation is.