There is no relationship between the number of hours cycled and the number of hours worked (Option D).
<h3>What is a scatterplot?</h3>
A scatterplot is a graph that is used to show the association between two variables. The relationship between the variables is shown by the use of line of best fit.
From the scatterplot shown, we can conclude that there is no relationship between the number of hours cycled and the number of hours worked (Option D).
Learn more about scatterplot:brainly.com/question/25280625
#SPJ1
4 sqrt(400) / 4 sqrt(5)
sqrt(400) =20
4 *20
--------
4 sqrt(5)
the 4's on the top and bottom cancel
20
--------
sqrt(5)
I was taught never to leave a sqrt in the denominator
so you need to multiply by sqrt (5) in the numerator and the denominator
20* sqrt(5)
--------
sqrt(5)* sqrt(5)
20* sqrt(5)
--------
5
= 4 sqrt(5)
Answer:
A and D are equal
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
![A=-2[-6, 4, 3 ,7, 12, 10]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D-2%5B-6%2C%204%2C%203%20%2C7%2C%2012%2C%2010%5D)
![B=3[-2, 2, 8, 8, 5, 6]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B%3D3%5B-2%2C%202%2C%208%2C%208%2C%205%2C%206%5D)
![3C=3[-2, 8, 2, 5, 8, 6]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3C%3D3%5B-2%2C%208%2C%202%2C%205%2C%208%2C%206%5D)
![D=-1[-12, 8, 6, 14, 24, 20].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=D%3D-1%5B-12%2C%208%2C%206%2C%2014%2C%2024%2C%2020%5D.)
Required
The equal matrices
First, we simplify the given expressions
Open bracket
![A= [12, -8, -6 ,-14, -24, -20]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%20%5B12%2C%20-8%2C%20-6%20%2C-14%2C%20-24%2C%20-20%5D)
Next:
Open bracket
![B=[-6, 6, 24, 24, 15, 18]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B%3D%5B-6%2C%206%2C%2024%2C%2024%2C%2015%2C%2018%5D)
Next:
Divide by 3
![C=[-2, 8, 2, 5, 8, 6]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C%3D%5B-2%2C%208%2C%202%2C%205%2C%208%2C%206%5D)
Lastly:
Open bracket
![D=[12, -8, -6, -14, -24, -20].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=D%3D%5B12%2C%20-8%2C%20-6%2C%20-14%2C%20-24%2C%20-20%5D.)
By comparison:
![A = D=[12, -8, -6, -14, -24, -20].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20D%3D%5B12%2C%20-8%2C%20-6%2C%20-14%2C%20-24%2C%20-20%5D.)
Answer:
If division of the packages in fractional numbers was possible, it should be 2.667 packages per pile.
The answer lies between 2 and 3 packages per pile.
Step-by-step explanation:
This can be solved as a simple division.
To split 8 packages in 3, this should correspond to 8/3≈2.667.
If division of the packages in fractional numbers was possible, it should be 2.667 packages per pile.
Other way to think about it is like mentally allocating a package in each pile. We can go up to 2 packages per pile (a total of 6 packages), and we can only add a package to 2 piles, letting the last pile to have only two packages.
Then, we have 2 piles with 3 packages and one pile with 2 packages.
