Answer: The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
Explanation: I learnt this already.
Answer:
Proactive interference
Explanation:
Proactive interference occurs when the old memories interfere with new information to restrain. Due to proactive interference, a person finds difficulties to store the new information because of the interference of old memories. It is not common phenomena but it occurs with everyone in their lifetime.
For example when you learned the name of Asian countries and after that, you might learn the name of the African country's name and you recall the names of African countries name you would probably miss the name of both Asian and African countries name.
Thus due to proactive interference, most people are not able to recall the new information because of similar information they learned before.
Answer:
The answer is: letter D, using reason and observation to solve a problem.
Explanation:
Renee Descartes was a French philosopher who founded the modern philosophy while Francis Bacon was an English philosopher who developed the scientific method. According to both of them, a critical step in reaching a sound scientific conclusion is by using reason and observation in order to solve it.
Observation and perceptual experiences co-existed in order to predict the outcome. In order to solve a problem,<u> the necessity to reason out is important. </u>The solution needs to have a reason in order to aid the readers how the researcher came up with it.
For example, Renee Descartes employed the cause-and-effect method when it comes to problem solving. He emphasized that reason was <u>the main source of the researcher's knowledge.</u>
Thus, this explains the answer.
Proximate cause is the determination that the defendant's breach of duty resulted directly in the plaintiff's injury
A defense to negligence. An unforeseeable event that interrupts the causal chain between the defendant's breach of duty and the damages the plaintiff suffered. Allow the defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence that the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
