Answer:
The correct answer is "startling statement"
Explanation:
A startling statement is an exponential declaration, that nobody expected and leaves everyone who hears, surprised.
I uploaded the answer in the link below
xhdibdm.com
Answer:
No, they wouldn't.
Explanation:
Any extra compensation to former stockholders of an acquired company which is based on post-combination share price or post-combination profits cannot be recognized as adjustments in the price of business combinations.
The reason for this is that changes in the fair value of contingent consideration (in case something happens) after the company has been acquired, e.g. achieving certain profits or stock price, are not considered period adjustments, therefore they cannot be included in the cost of the business combination (acquisition).
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Sales = $27000
Less: sales returned = -$660
Less: discount at 2% = ($27000 - $660) × 2% = -$526.8
Net sales = $25813.2
b. Net sales = $25813.2
Less: cost of goods sold = $15000 - $400 = -$14600
Gross profit = $11213.2
Operating expense:
Less: Selling and administrative expenses = -$2835
Operating income = $8378.2
Non-operating items:
Less: Interest expense = ($200
Add: Gain on land Sales = $900
Net Income= $9078.2
c. The interest expense be shown on the statement of cash flows in the operating expenses section. It'll be recorded in the operating activities.
d. The sale of the land would be under the investing activity as it's capital asset of the business. Therefore, the full sales price of the land, $9,250, would be shown as a cash inflow from investing activities on the statement of cash flows.
Option B is the correct answer.
