<u>Answer:</u>
The purpose of analyzing a play is (B) to offer a specific interpretation of the play
.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Whenever someone analyses a play, it means he is trying to understand the message of the author better. The person is trying to understand the characters deeply and the style of the writing of the play is also analysed. So, option B is correct.
Option A is incorrect as one doesn’t summarize a play’s plot or story while analysing it. Neither the person tries to understand the geographical setting of the play, as per option C. Option D is incorrect as well as analysing is not providing description of the scenes of the play.
Answer:
Affectionate
Explanation:
The Glass Menagerie is a play that tells the story of Tom Wingfield who dreams of being a poet while working hard in a warehouse to be able to support his family.
Tom and Laura are brothers and although they often do not understand each other and do not agree with each other's attitudes, they have a very strong, deep and affectionate relationship, where one cares about the other and supports each other's success, even if they sometimes do it in a non-literal way.
Answer:
The minister's black veil in lines 101-136 reveals his individuality when his courtesy was paid with 'strange and bewildered looks.'
Explanation:
"The Minister's Black Veil" is a short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The story is about a minister named 'Mr. Hooper.'
The story is about human nature, sin, and guilt. In the story, Nathaniel has portrayed Mr. Hooper as a sole individual, the one who is ready to accept the truth.
In lines 101-136, when Mr. Hooper comes out after the service, the congregation began to shake their 'sagacious heads', some began to profane the Sabbath day with their 'ostentatious laughter.' But when Mr. Hooper came out he greeted everyone as he used to do every Sunday after service, bless little ones, etc. The individuality of Mr. Hooper can be seen here when he was paid back with 'strange and bewildered looks' for his civility, he was neglected an invitation on dinner, when no one wanted to walk beside the Minister as an honor.
The two details that best show how the people of Winesburg feel about George are:
<h3>Who is George Willard?</h3>
This is a character in the novel which tells about the trauma that solidifies George's decision to embark on “the adventure of life” in a new city as a result of the death of Elizabeth.
As George Willard was thinking about his past than his future, he had a hard time leaving Winesburg because he realizes how much the people and place have meant to him.
Read more about George Willard
<em>brainly.com/question/4088015</em>
#SPJ1
Hello. Did you forget to show that the underlined words to which the question refers are: cruel favor
In addition, you forgot to show the answer options. The options are:
The underlined figure of speech is ________ (choices: a euphemism, a simile, a metaphor, an oxymoron)
The reader can infer that ________ (choices: the narrator plans to take up baking with Lisette, the narrator feels that Lisette should do her more favors, the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies, the narrator suspects that Lisette is dishonest with her)
Answer:
1. euphemism
2. the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies
Explanation:
Euphenism is the figure of speech that has a lighter and more pleasant term, softening a bad meaning of another term that could be used. In this case, when the narrator says that Lisette took the Brownies as a "cruel favor" he wanted to soften the meaning that eating her brownies would be a bad experience.
Furthermore, by using eupenism, the author reinforces the idea that since Lisette is a very kind person, he will pretend to like the brownies, even if he doesn't like it.
