1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
5

Read the three situations below and write the "check" or power that the branch of government would have on the situation. Use yo

ur class notes on checks and balances to help you make your decision.
1. Congress passed a law forbidding religious freedom for anyone but Protestants. What can the President do to check Congress?
2. A Supreme Court Justice, appointed for life, accepts a bribe to influence his decision on a case. What can Congress do to check the Supreme Court in this instance?
3. The President appoints his brother to be Secretary of State, even though he is massively unqualified. What can Congress do to check the President in this instance?

Law
1 answer:
Firdavs [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I will fo my best wait

Explanation:

I will answer and screenshot this

You might be interested in
32. Abandonar la escena de una colisión que causa más de $50 en daños resultara en:
lukranit [14]
The answer is B because i just took the test
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
As a child, what did you think would be awesome about being an adult, but isn’t as awesome as you thought it would be?
Rzqust [24]
Having my own house. As a child, it seems fun to have a place to yourself and be able to decorate it however you’d like. As an adult, you realize you have to pay a large amount of money for the house, bills, etc.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describes an advantage of purchasing property rather
Anettt [7]

Answer:

B, The Long term costs are lower

4 0
3 years ago
The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, p
Valentin [98]

The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, and other illegal activities is called Organized

Crime.

<h3>What is  OrganizedCrime?</h3>

Organized crime refers to global, national, or local groups of highly centralised criminal businesses that engage in illicit conduct, most typically for profit.

Members of organised criminal groups enjoy a sense of prestige, power, and protection in addition to money. Groups, like legal enterprises, have a pyramid power structure.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), enacted in 1970, is a federal statute aimed at combating organised crime in the United States. It allows for civil and criminal consequences for racketeering activities carried out as part of a continuing criminal enterprise.

To know more about  OrganizedCrime follow the link:

brainly.com/question/10571360

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • ________ manifest(s) in several ways, including changes to the browser, redirecting startup pages on Internet browsers, replacin
    7·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST !!
    6·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    11·1 answer
  • Opioids have the following short term effects:
    12·1 answer
  • Give me more than three reasons that you hate trump
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think it took so long for women, African-Americans, and Native-Americans to be given the right to vote?
    13·1 answer
  • IF YOU BECOME ANGRY OR UPSET, YOU SHOULD: A. Control your emotions while driving B. Park the car and "cool down" before driving
    7·1 answer
  • Question 11 (5 points)
    8·1 answer
  • Why did congress fail to sign the bill in the first place?
    11·1 answer
  • ——-Heighten aggressive or hostile behavior and distort the drivers decision making process
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!