1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mylen [45]
3 years ago
6

Statistics show that many crimes have been declining over the last decade. Why do you think we are seeing a decline in crime? Do

you believe that the statistics are accurate?
Law
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

- After decades of soaring levels of homicides and drug violence, the country's crime rate plunged dramatically over the last 25 years. ... In the early 1990s, U.S. crime rates had been on a steep upward climb since the Lyndon B. ... Did they see similar declines when they liberalized their abortion laws?

Explanation:

Then crime rates went down. And then they kept going down.

By decade’s end, the homicide rate plunged 42 percent nationwide. Violent crime decreased by one-third. What turned into a precipitous decline started later in some areas and took longer in others. But it happened everywhere: in each region of the country, in cities large and small, in rural and urban areas alike. In the Northeast, which reaped the largest benefits, the homicide rate was halved. Murders plummeted by 75 percent in New York City alone as the city entered the new millennium.

The trend kept ticking downward from there, more slowly and with some fluctuations, to the present day. By virtually any metric, Americans now live in one of the least violent times in the nation’s history.

MORE IN THIS SERIES

A&Q

Questioning popular answers to pressing conundrums

What Can the U.S. Do About Mass Incarceration?

CLARE FORAN

How Can the U.S. End Homelessness?

ALANA SEMUELS

SPONSOR CONTENT

The dangerous world of insurance inspection

ALLSTATE

What Should the World Do With Its Nuclear Weapons?

You might be interested in
What is the advantage and disadvantage Of written and unwritten constitution ​
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

One of the major advantages of a written constitution is the fact that it can be easily consulted. This is unlike an unwritten constitution because a written constitution is contained in one single document. Although, other laws may be incorporated into it by reference in its provisions.

8 0
2 years ago
Which branch of the federal has the power to appoint federal judges?
user100 [1]

Answer:

The correct answer is Executive Branch .

Explanation:

The executive branch is made up of the president, vice president, and his entire cabinet. For the appointment of a federal judge, the appointment of the President and an approval of the Senate are required considering the provisions of Article 3 of the Constitution of the United States. The duration of this appointment is indefinite, unless the judge commits a crime and must be tried for it.

3 0
2 years ago
How is an ordinance different from a precedent? Write in a point.​
gregori [183]

Ordinance Is a law or decree by a municipality. Meanwhile precedent a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar fact, or similar legal issues.

6 0
1 year ago
Brianna has saved money for college. She will need to write checks or use a debit card to pay tuition two or three times a year,
grandymaker [24]

Answer: I thinks its a checking account

Explanation:

6 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can an environmental law affect a business
    15·2 answers
  • What makes fingerprints individual and unique? How do scientists match a fingerprint to a specific person?
    10·1 answer
  • MSNBC responded to Fox's ratings success by a. recasting themselves as the liberal alternative to Fox. b. attempting to lure aud
    6·1 answer
  • In court, what would a prosecutor need to document for evidence to be admitted?
    8·1 answer
  • What document do you need in order to appeal?
    7·2 answers
  • Police officers are like any other employees in many ways. One important factor is our motivation level. What are the five motiv
    5·1 answer
  • Pick one
    10·2 answers
  • Explain the statute of general application​
    11·2 answers
  • Computer science was banned in 1999 because of what hacking program?
    12·1 answer
  • How would a jury determine that a person had no control of themselves when they committed a crime?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!