1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zarrin [17]
2 years ago
14

What is the need and importance of public awareness in tackling social problems and evils?​

Social Studies
2 answers:
Dafna1 [17]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

(Explanation=Answer)

Explanation:

Public awareness is very important to solve social problems. Raising public awareness is not telling public what to do but it explains issues and disseminates knowledge to people so they can make their own decisions.

(I got this exact question 2 weeks ago for school so yea.... HERE YA GO)

Oksanka [162]2 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

public awareness is the important measure in solving social problems and evils because if we conduct awareness program then it makes people more conscious, alert, attentive to bring change in our society and transform a society in progress.

I think it will help you

You might be interested in
"Government of the people, by the people, for the people" describes a system of government in which
vodomira [7]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of Snoozer v. Early. What type of case was it, and what could be its o
oee [108]

Answer:

It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss  of her birds.

Explanation:

A jury has the responsibility of making the decision if, on the facts presented in the case, an individual is guilty or not guilty of the crime being charged. The verdict is reached after evidence has been produced and presented in court to allow the judge take a stand. In this case, Snoozer was seeking the compensation for loss of the birds that were missing.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the Nutrition Facts panel on a package of cream cheese, a 1 oz serving of the cheese supplies 70 kcal; 50 of the kc
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

According to the Nutrition Facts panel on a package of cream cheese, a 1 oz serving of the cheese supplies 70 kcal; 50 of the kcal are from fat. Based on this information, fat contributes about <u><em>71%</em></u> of total kcal.

Explanation:

For the calculations, lets see that 1 oz serving of the cheese has 70kcal. Out of this, 50kcal are from fat.

Now,

50 divided by 70 multiplied by 100 will be will be 71%. Hence, we will say that based on the information provided, 71% of the cheese supplies would be from fat.

7 0
2 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
2 years ago
One of gorachev s reforms, prestrokia, had the goal of
harina [27]

Mikhail Gorbachev encouraged the political movement called Perestroika to restructure the Soviet political and economic system during the 1980s and 1990s. The measure aimed to allow more independency in the actions taken by the ministries and the market. Although the movement did not intend to command the economy, it was focused on making socialist policies more efficient for the Soviet citizens. He would refer to this process as <em>glasnost,</em> which means openness and transparency.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When a health educator respects the rights, dignity, confidentiality, and worth of people, he or she is showing:?
    14·1 answer
  • "memories for general facts are referred to as _____ memory."
    12·1 answer
  • What free African American fought at both bunker hill and Saratoga?
    10·1 answer
  • The term hispanic is used by the u.s. federal government to describe anyone
    8·1 answer
  • Which development occurred in Germany as a result of the terms imposed by the Treaty of Versailles
    9·1 answer
  • Who controlled what is now mexico and texas?
    12·1 answer
  • The first government of the united states was the
    12·1 answer
  • Please help<br>How did Nightingale improve the condition of the soldier of Crimean war?​
    11·1 answer
  • What were the two major causes of the Civil War?
    7·2 answers
  • List 2 natural barriers that have helped keep Russia isolated from the rest of the world.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!