The given statement is "false".
Leaders might be worried for their people and they likewise should have some worry for the work to be finished. The inquiry is, what amount of consideration regarding they pay to either? This is a model characterized by Blake and Mouton in the mid 1960s. According to their model, Authority-compliance is a concern in which leaders show a high concern for production and a low concern for people. in <span>middle of the road style, leaders show little concern about both people and work.</span>
1. a place to stay
2. dehydration
3. starvation
4. carrying there baggage (if carrying any)
5. if anyone needs medical attention, where they would find it
6. getting a job to make money
extra- if they had to leave anyone behind they would be worried about them or if they had to go different ways!
Answer:
Social exchange theory
Explanation:
Social exchange theory is the theory that says that social behavior is the result of an exchange process.
According to this theory, people weigh the potential benefits and risks of their actions. When the risks outweigh the rewards, people will not engage in the action or conduct.
In this case, <u>Person A donated money because the potential benefits included the boost of her self-esteem</u>, since this weight too much to this person, she donated the money.
On the other side, <u>the risks for Person B outweighed the rewards, since he was fearful or running out of money </u>and therefore he did not donate it.
Answer:
Fossils are physical evidence of preexisting organisms, either plant or animal. Fossils of any kind are useful in "reading the rock record," meaning they help us decipher the history of the earth.Explanation:
The correct answer is letter C
Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics that presents useful action as the best action, the right action.
The most common description of utilitarianism concerns the well-being of sentient beings, those who are capable of feeling pain and pleasure, in some cases even non-humans. This description is the reason why, in modern times, utilitarianism has been used in discussions about the suffering of non-human animals and ethical aspects involved in the production of animals for food purposes. For Bentham, utility is the aggregate of pleasures, after deducting the suffering of everyone involved in an action, a kind of liquid pleasure, which would be the basis for happiness. Stuart Mill, on the other hand, had a broader concept, focusing his efforts on rules rather than individual moral actions. In this concept, Mill included not only quantity, but the quality of pleasure, which contributed to the sophistication of the debate. Some authors, on the other hand, tried to develop the so-called negative utilitarianism, which denies the positive value of pleasure, trying to define the utility in terms of suffering, in this way, the most useful would be the one that causes the least suffering. Other variations, such as those by Henry Sidgwick, R. M. Hare and Peter Singer, include satisfaction of preferences and even more ingrained moral values in the concept of utility.
