I'm not good with Grammar. But, I like writing fictional stories. Here you can use one of mine if you want. This is the idea: Lien, Jeffrey, Alejandro and Lola go to a field trip to a science museum. Once inside Lola the most troublesome of them 4 accidentally overhears a conversation where 2 scientist are plotting to build an underwater city because Armageddon was near. After hearing this she tells her 3 friends Lien, Alejandro and Jeffrey. However they don't believe her. So what Lola does is that she alone follows the scientist around and she uncovers hidden secrets as of where the underwater city might be etc. And in one of those times she was spying she realizes the scientist are working on a force field to seal the city. She finds out where the city is hidden.
Later on Lola finds submarines in the museum and decides to go herself to the city and save herself since her friends aren't willing to listen to her. She is not captured, get's away with it and when Armageddon comes she is inside the city protected by the underwater force field. And among her are other thousands of survivors. Details can be added to it. Don't you think?
Answer:
Is this the question?
Explanation:
"He's in every lover . . . beneath a window" is an allusion to Romeo that is recognizable even to readers who have not read Romeo and Juliet. What does the repetition of the words "in every" throughout the poem signal to readers? What message does Tempest convey through these words?
Answer: Khattam-Shud shows Haroun on the ship that each story in the Ocean requires its own type of poison to properly ruin it, and suggests how one can ruin different types of stories. Iff mutters that to ruin an Ocean of Stories, you add a Khattam-Shud. The Cultmaster continues that each story has an anti-story that cancels the original story out, which he mixes on the ship and pours into the ocean. Haroun, stunned, asks why Khattam-Shud hates stories so much, and says that stories are fun. Khattam Shud replies that the world isn't for fun, it's for controlling. He continues that in each story there is a world he cannot control, which is why he must kill them.
Explanation:
Iff here simplifies Khattam-Shud's explanation, as all that's needed to really end a story is to say it's over. However, Khattam-Shud is working to not just end stories by simply saying they're over, but to make them unappealing to audiences, which will then insure that they won't be told, Silence Laws or not. Think about the ancient stories around the Wellspring; they exist as an example of what happens when stories are deemed boring and not useful.
Answer:
C: The speaker is intelegent and clever, but did not excel in high school.
Explanation:
This is because the entire time the writer talks about not being a loser and not doing well in highschool thus eliminating D along with B because he doesn't say much about his stepfather. It also can't be A because there was no evidence of the writer being lazy.
Also, I did it on USA test prep
