Answer: The Supreme Court should be a reflection of America in every way.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court is one of the most important institutions of the United States. The racial structure should be equally represented in that institution. Such a situation should be realistic because the racial representation of all groups in the country is important. According to recent reports, whites dominate the institution, which is certainly not a fair ratio.
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Cyrus' conquest was relatively humane compared to empires preceding his, such as the Babylonians and Assyrians. He allowed many areas of his empire a great deal of autonomy, rather than centrally controlling things. This distributed leadership allowed Persia to cover a greater geographical area than previous empires in that era and still be fairly stable, since most of its subjects were content to remain under Persian rule. Persian law was more codified and less arbitrary than previous empires; the king's seal declared approval of law which could only be reversed by further approved decrees -- not quite rule of law but going in that direction.
Good Morning!
John H. Clark and Oliver Wendell Holmes disagreed on the Espionage Act of 1917, which punished anyone who opposed US participation in the Great War. For Clark, anti-war pamphlets and advertisements harmed the US and endangered national integrity. For Holmes, it is fully guaranteed by constitutional freedom, any stances contrary to an attitude of the central government.
Hugs!
