Answer:
The basic cosmological argument merely establishes that a First Cause exists, not that it has the attributes of a theistic god, such as omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence.[23] This is why the argument is often expanded to show that at least some of these attributes are necessarily true, for instance in the modern Kalam argument given above.[1]
Explanation:
Secondly, it is argued that the premise of causality has been arrived at via a posteriori (inductive) reasoning, which is dependent on experience. David Hume highlighted this problem of induction and argued that causal relations were not true a priori. However, as to whether inductive or deductive reasoning is more valuable still remains a matter of debate, with the general conclusion being that neither is prominent.[22] Opponents of the argument tend to argue that it is unwise to draw conclusions from an extrapolation of causality beyond experience.[1]One objection to the argument is that it leaves open the question of why the First Cause is unique in that it does not require any causes. Proponents argue that the First Cause is exempt from having a cause, while opponents argue that this is special pleading or otherwise untrue.[1] Critics often press that arguing for the First Cause’s exemption raises the question of why the First Cause is indeed exempt,[20] whereas defenders maintain that this question has been answered by the various arguments, emphasizing that none of its major forms rests on the premise that everything has a cause.[21]
Answer:
Explanation:
The statement that best describes this excerpt is "Most of the sentences have a similar structure". Most of the sentences that integrate this excerpt have a similar structure because <u>all of them, except for the first one, begin with the determiner "her"</u>. Moreover, <u>most of them have a noun as head of the subject</u>. For example, in sentences 3, 4, 5 and 6, the heads are "cause", "principles", "temper" and "conduct" respectively. Furthermore, <u>most of the sentences have a subject complement</u>. In the case of sentence 2, 3, 4 and 5, the subject complements are "unclouded and promising", "good", "just and liberal" and "serene and firm" respectively. Therefore, the structure of most of the sentences in this excerpt is Subject + Verb + Subject Complement.
Answer:
“The foreign secretary wanted to be certain that this message reached von Bernstorff”
“he made arrangements for it to be carried aboard a U-boat”
Explanation:
This is a passage from <em>"The Dark Game"</em>, Paul Janeczko's novel about espionage that took place throughout the history of The United States.
The passage describes the hardships that Germany faced during the World War Two. As Germany was loosing the war in 1917, their tactic was to find allies. Mexico, being close to the United States of America, was a great ally.
The suffix is -er because the suffix is at the end of a word
