An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
<h3>What is
blockbusting?</h3>
blockbusting can be regarded as the act of profiteering through inducing property owners to sell hastily which do occur at a loss by appeals to fears of depressed values.
In this case, An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
Learn more about blockbusting on:
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) They would be indifferent, as Sally's income net of costs equals $25,000.
Explanation:
Sally's economic profit = accounting profit - opportunity costs
- accounting profit = $12,000
- opportunity costs = $25,000 - $15,000 in lost salaries + $2,000 (lost investment revenue) = $12,000
economic profit = $12,000 - $12,000 = $0
Since the economic profit is $0, Sally should be indifferent between running her own business or working for someone else.
Answer:
Total bet amount= -$2
Explanation:
In a card deck of 52 cards we have 13 diamond cards. Cards are drawn without replacement.
Probability of the first card being diamond = 13/52
Probability of the send card being diamond= 12/51
So the probability for both cards being diamond = (13/52)*(12/51)= 0.0588235
Bet amount for 2 diamonds= probability* amount received
Bet amount for 2 diamonds= 0.0588235* $30= $1.765
Probability of no diamond= 1- 0.0588235
Probability of no diamond= 0.94118
Bet amount for no diamonds= 0.94118* (-$4)
Bet amount for no diamonds= -$3.765
Total bet amount= Bet amount for diamonds + bet amount for no diamonds
Total bet amount= $1.765+ (-$3.765)
Total bet amount= -$2
Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
