1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tresset [83]
4 years ago
12

Price discrimination:A. by firms selling to final consumers is illegal, but it is usually legal in selling to intermediaries.

Business
1 answer:
Firlakuza [10]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D. may be legal if the firm can prove that different prices were set based on different costs.

Explanation:

The competition and consumer act seeks to prevent unfair price discrimination by ensuring that sellers offer the same price terms to customers at a given level of trade. However , price discrimination is allowed if the seller can prove that its costs are different when selling to different customers.

You might be interested in
Calls arrive at Lynn Ann​ Fish's hotel switchboard at a rate of 2.5 per minute. The average time to handle each is 20 seconds. T
defon

Answer:

50

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A store has 5 years remaining on its lease in a mall. Rent is $1, 900 per month, 60 payments remain, and the next payment is due
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

a) No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.

b) Detailed information about the explanation is shown below

c) At 39.80%  nominal WACC

Explanation:

a

           PV of old and new lease terms

            Old              Cash Flow                New              Cash Flow

             0                  0                               0                    0                    

           1-9               - 1900                         1-9                   0                    

       10-60              - 1900                         10-60              2700

           NPER              60                          NPER                60

           rate                  1%                          rate                   1%

           PV             ($85,414.57)                PV                   ($98,250.36)

                            PV ( 1%, 60, 1900)                 PV ( 1%,9,- PV(1%,51, 2700))

Should the new lease be accepted? <u> No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.</u>

b)   If the store owner decided to bargain with the mall's owner over the new lease payment, what new lease payment would make the store owner indifferent between the new and the old leases?

For this part pv of old lease should be equal to pv of new lease at t = 9

                85414.57 × (1.01)⁹                             93416.657

                Nper                                                  51

                Rate                                                   1%

                New lease amount                           ( $2,347.26)

                                                                           PMT (1%, 51,93416.66)

c)

        Period      Old Lease       New Lease      Change in lease

          0                  0                    0                     0  

         1-9            -1900                 0                    -1900  

        10-60        -1900                  -2700             800

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        -1900    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800  

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800    

        800

        3.317%                  x 12   =   39.80%

IRR(Values 1:60)

The store owner is not sure of the 12% WACC - it could be higher or lower. At what nominal WACC would the store owner be indifferent between the two leases?

At 39.80%  nominal WACC

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these is NOT an example of discharge for cause?
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

felonious conduct?

Explanation:

.........

3 0
3 years ago
Q 11.20: Katie Inc. reported net income of $171,000 for the current year and paid dividends of $26,000 on common stock. It also
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

The company's return on common stockholders’ equity for the current year is 8%

Explanation:

<em>Step 1: Determine net income available to common stockholders</em>

The net income available to common stockholder can be expressed as;

net income available to common stockholders=net income-preferred stocks dividends

where;

net income=$171,000

preferred stocks dividends=$10,000×0.06×100=$60,000

replacing;

net income available to common stockholders=171,000-(10,000×0.06×100)=$111,000

<em>Step 2: Determine the company's return on stockholder's equity for the current year</em>

This can be expressed as;

The company’s return on common stockholders’ equity for the year=net income available to common stockholders/(common stock holders equity on January 1+common stockholders equity on December 31)/2

where;

net income available to common stockholders=$111,000

common stock holders equity on January 1=$1,200,000

common stockholders equity on December 31=$1,600,000

replacing;

($111,000/ ($1,200,000 +$1,600,000)/2))=(111,000/1,400,000)×100=7.93%=8%

The company's return on common stockholders’ equity for the current year is 8%

4 0
3 years ago
G tax cuts
sammy [17]

i believe the answer is B

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose the Andrews company expands to other markets with good designs, high awareness, and easy accountability, what strategy w
    14·1 answer
  • Price discrimination:A. by firms selling to final consumers is illegal, but it is usually legal in selling to intermediaries.
    12·1 answer
  • When Excedrin introduced its new Excedrin Migraine into its product line of pain relievers, it was introducing what is called a:
    8·1 answer
  • ​Plowin' Supply plans to make 15000 tractors at its plant. Fixed costs are $ 540000 and variable costs are $ 200 per tractor. Wh
    6·1 answer
  • On July 1, based on prior experience, Rocky estimated there is a 40% chance it will earn the bonus for July tours. It guided a t
    7·1 answer
  • How could I study and prepare myself for my ged test all subjects
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following customers generally switch companies easily?
    9·2 answers
  • purchased a new piece of equipment for its research lab on January 1, 2015 for $45,200. The equipment is expected to have a usef
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following investments has a higher present value, assuming the same (strictly positive) interest rate applies to bo
    9·1 answer
  • Giancarlo has received an inheritance from his rich uncle and is contemplating the purchase of a Suzuki XL7. In an attempt to ma
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!