The Feudal System was familiarized to England following the attacked and victory of the country by William I (The Conqueror). The system of feudalism was used by the Normans in the France. In this system all the land was under the control of the King and he was the one who owned all the land.
The king further used to divide the land between personal and other uses. One fourth of the total land was kept by the owner/king for his personal use/property while some was given to the church and the rest was rent out under strict controls.
The people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.
<h3>Who are the
Iconoclasts?</h3>
Basically, an Iconoclasm means “an image breaking” and refers to a recurring historical impulse to destroy images for religious or political reasons.
For instance, in ancient Egypt, the carved visages of some pharaohs were obliterated by their successors and during the French Revolution, the images of kings were defaced.
Hence, the people in the Byzantine Empire who disagreed with the position being argued with the quoted word "<em>Those fall into the same blasphemy who venerate the image, and the same woe rests upon both.</em>" would be called the <u>Iconoclasts</u>.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Iconoclasts
brainly.com/question/25758528
#SPJ1
Answer:
He thought he was brought into trial because he was a foreigner because he said he was tried in a time that had a lot of hate and resentment going around and being against foreigners and slackers.
He could have also been brought into trial because he was a slacker, and the evidence is the same as the top answer. There was a lot of hate for slackers and foreigners, so he could have been slacking at his job and got into trial.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The right can be traced back to the Bill of Rights 1689, the Petition of Right (1628), and Magna Carta (1215).
Explanation:
<span>
Japan emerged in 1853 from two and a half centuries of self-imposed peaceful isolation, but within a few decades the country’s leaders embarked on a policy of aggressive territorial expansion. During the last half of the nineteenth century, the Western imperialist powers of England, France, and Germany established the model for acquisition of colonies in Asia and for the partition of China into spheres of influence. Near the end of the century, about the same time Japan began to capture colonial territory, the United States and Russia also initiated their imperialistic expansion in Asia.This paper will examine four of the most influential theories of imperialism to determine whether they can provide explanations for Japan’s imperialism from 1894 to 1910, when Japan formally annexed Korea. The four theories to be reviewed will be Hobson's theory of domestic market underconsumption that leads to capitalists seeking profits overseas, Lenin's theory of the monopoly stage of capitalism, Schumpeter's theory of inherited warlike tendencies from prior generations, and nationalism's focus on politics as the critical factor. Although other theories of imperialism exist, these four theories cover a broad range of economic, political, and sociological factors that could explain Japan’s imperialistic expansion. This essay's review of Japan's history of imperialism from 1894 to 1910 will show that the theory of nationalism provides the best explanations of the causes of Japan's militaristic actions and colonial acquisitions, although Schumpeter's sociological-based theory seems to provide some explanation for the actions of the Meiji Period (1868-1912) leaders.</span>
