9514 1404 393
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We can start with the point-slope form of the equation for a line. To meet the given requirements, we can use a point of (5, 0) and a slope of -1. Then the equation in that form is ...
y -0 = -1(x -5)
Simplifying gives the slope-intercept form:
y = -x +5 . . . . . . . use the distributive property to eliminate parentheses
Adding x to both sides gives the standard form:
x + y = 5
__
<em>Explanation</em>
We know the line has the required intercept and slope because we chose those values to put into the point-slope form. Conversion from one form to another made use of the rules of equality, the additive identity element (y-0=y), and the distributive property.
Answer:
I think it might be the 2 one
The second survey is more believable because there is randomness in the second rather than the first survey. Since the second company surveyed in all interest levels while the first company only surveyed their best customers. Random sampling like what the second company did helps produce representative samples by removing voluntary response bias and undercover age bias.
Answer:
yes it is (2,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
if you see in there where both of the lines intersect or touch each other (the gray dot)
the point of intersect is at (2, -3)