By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
C - <span>Maddison thinks Earl wastefully spent money on his diner.
</span>
<span>The one reason that Thomas Paine thinks the colonies stand a
good chance against the British was that the colonies had very less to lose in
the fight against the British. On the other hand the British had everything to
lose once the colonies freed themselves from the oppression. The colonies had
every resource to prepare arms for the fight against the British. The British
would lose out financially in a big way as the colonies would then stop paying
undue taxes that the British government charged. </span>
<h3>What is review?</h3>
A review article may also be referred to as a review of literature or a literature review. It is a review of earlier studies that have been done on the subject. It need to include a summary of the most recent research on the subject. Additionally, it won't include any brand-new experimental findings, unlike an original study report. The purpose of writing a review of literature is to offer a critical assessment of the data from previous research. Review papers might point up prospective directions for future study, and occasionally they will derive novel insights from the data already available.
#SPJ4
I think it would be either C or A, but I think C is more right than A
