Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
The Liberty Boys or "Sons of Liberty" protested the Stamp Act.
Answer:
he was showing how the decision didn't have a large sucsess rate.
Explanation:
disclamer: I have no idea what this is about, but I can analyze the cartoon.
the instability and lack of support showed that the desicion was not the solidest ever made. there were no other supports, showing that is anyone wanted to they could destroy the log and the money as well would fall
The statement that questions and debate regarding the ethical standards for truth telling are central and fundamental in the negotiating process is true. Knowing the norms of ethics and negotiation are useful whether you’re negotiating for reaching a compromise or agreement while avoiding argument and dispute, for yourself or on behalf of someone else.
