The Russian revolutionaries wanted something more than famine and injustice -- and that's much of what existed in Russia at that time. They wanted equality for all persons. That was a big goal of the communist agenda, and the Russian Revolution was a communist endeavor. They wanted to achieve that equality both in terms of wealth/property and in terms of political status and rights.
Was it dangerous? Absolutely. The reign of the tsars had gone on in Russia for centuries, and military victory over the tsar's armies had to be won for the revolution to succeed. And it was not going to be easy to make the nation better off, even after the revolution. The people would expect results from the new government. Those results were going to be hard to achieve.
Over time, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which was the nation brought about by the Russian Revolution, has to become more and more authoritarian and repressive to keep its agenda going. And eventually that agenda failed, when about 75 years after the revolution, the USSR's government collapsed.
The Democratic Republican Party was founded based on the ideas of the Anti-Federalists, who were opposed to the ratification of the Constitution and were in favor of states' rights over federal rights.
Accused person have the right to request a witness to APPEAR IN COURT.
The Sixth Amendment of the United States granted some rights to an accused person and these include the right of the person to know the person or group of persons who have brought accusations against him. The accused also have the right to request that his accusers should appear in court and this request must be granted by the accusers.
Answer:
people like david rockefeller
Explanation:
the bourgeoisie are the people (as described by Marx) who control the bulk of industry and transfer of commodities
The Anti-Imperialist<span> League was founded on June 15, 1898 in Boston, in opposition of the acquisition of the Philippines, which happened anyway. The </span>anti-imperialists<span> opposed the expansion because they believed </span>imperialism<span> violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for "consent of the governed." <--- This is what an anti-imperialist is.
I know that Hawaii is an imperialist nation so an anti- imperialist would most likely say, "down with republicanism."
I hope this helps. :P </span>
