1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tresset_1 [31]
3 years ago
10

Which kept African Americans from nominating candidates for office?

History
2 answers:
borishaifa [10]3 years ago
7 0

    Although all of the options prevented African Americans from voting on elections, the one who kept African Americas from nominating candidates for office was the option C.White primaries.

    The White Primaries were southern laws  of the Democratic party that blocked African Americans to voting on the primaries, prohibiting it. From 1896, along with the other <em>disenfranchisement strategies </em>(poll taxes, literacy tests and the Grandfather clauses), the White Primaries impeded the possibilities of the negro people from choosing a representative that would favor their causes; As in southern U.S the hardships for the African Americans were greater, a big amount of Black people would migrate to north and west, as we get to know as Great Migration.

    The White Primaries was completely abolished only by the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

borishaifa [10]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is white primarys

You might be interested in
What could farmers do to address the problems created by deforestation?
morpeh [17]
I would say D as well. Animals need homes to live in... and they can't live in that area if the trees and plant life is always getting cut down. 
6 0
3 years ago
What is something said by or about the Regulators of South Carolina?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

The Regulators were backcountry settlers who banded together in 1767 in response to a wave of crime that swept their region in the aftermath of a disruptive war with the Cherokee Indians (1759–1761). Bandit gangs, including women as well as escaped slaves, roamed the country with little fear of capture.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How do you think the war will affect black citizens and soldiers in the us?
saw5 [17]

Answer:.

Explanation:

n 1778 the Continental Congress authorized funds and instructed General George Washington to send an expedition of the Continental Army into Iroquois country to “chastise,” or punish, “those of the Six Nations that were hostile to the United Stated.”  For more than two years, four of the Iroquois Confederacy’s Six Nations, specifically the Cayuga, Onondaga, Mohawk and Seneca, along with many of the tribes they considered their “dependents” and allies, had “taken up the hatchet” in the king’s favor.

Although led by their own war chiefs, the war parties were often accompanied by officers and rangers of the British Indian Department, who coordinated their efforts with the British military.  Other Crown forces were also operating against American settlements.  One was a corps of Loyalist volunteers and Mohawk warriors commanded by Captain Joseph Brant, or Thayendanegea, a Mohawk leading warrior and officer of the British Indian Department.  Another was Butler’s Rangers, a corps of Provincial regular light infantry raised specifically to “cooperate” with the allied warriors and fight according to the Indian “mode” of warfare.  It was commanded by long-time Indian Department officer John Butler.  Butler served concurrently as the Deputy Superintendent for the Six Nations with the Indian Department rank of lieutenant colonel, while at the same time holding a major’s commission in Provincial service as the commander of his ranger battalion.  Together they these forces conducted a campaign that terrorized American frontier settlements of New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia.

These attacks had several objectives.  First, they could divert the attention of Continental forces from the movements of their regular field armies.  Second, keeping the backcountry alarmed would interfere with the recruitment of potential volunteers from those districts, and hinder the ability of the militia to reinforce the hard-pressed Continentals.  This strategy also constituted a form of economic warfare.  By attacking productive agricultural communities, laying fields to waste and destroying harvested crops and livestock before they were taken to market could prove destructive to American commerce.  The British could also interfere with the American supply system by reducing the availability of provisions that could be purchased to stock military supply magazines, and force state governments to draw on the provisions already stored in them for the relief and subsistence of suffering inhabitants.  The plunder taken from the targeted American farms also presented British irregulars and their allied Indian war parties a source of supply when donations from “friends of the king” were insufficient.  There was also an element of psychological warfare in the British plans.  Under the threat of attack and devastation lest they swear allegiance to the king, the war on the frontier could weaken support for the cause of independence.  These “depredations” reached a peak in 1778, especially with the particularly brutal Wyoming and Cherry Valley Massacres, and all intelligence indicated the raids would continue into 1779.  Answering calls by the governors and congressional delegates from those states most affected, the Continental Army prepared to take the offensive.

Washington began developing a plan for a coordinated campaign to “scourge the Indians properly.” He envisioned an operation “at a season when their Corn is about half grown,” and proposed a two-pronged attack, the main effort advancing up the Susquehanna from the Wyoming Valley, and a supporting wing advancing from the Mohawk.  Both would be supported by a third expedition advancing up the Allegheny River and into Iroquois country from Fort Pitt as a diversion.  In his planning guidance, Washington specified the “only object should be that of driving off the Indians and destroying their Grain.”  Once accomplished, the expedition would return to the Main Army whether or not a major engagement was fought.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What causes a wage-price spiral, and how does it affect the economy?
n200080 [17]

Answer:

A wage-price spiral is caused by the effect of supply and demand on aggregate prices. The rise in aggregate demand and the increased wage burden causes businesses to increase the prices of products and services. Although wages are higher the increase in prices causes workers to demand even higher salaries.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help to solve this answer. Please help! I'll give 20 points.
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When categorizing the executive offices of the President, what can you assume when noting the number of departments devoted to a
    6·1 answer
  • what inspired the inclusion in the declaration of independence of the right of the people to revolt against a tyrannical governm
    10·1 answer
  • What was one of the Civil Rights act of 1964?
    15·1 answer
  • Part A
    14·1 answer
  • Iranian Muslim leaders opposed this leader
    8·2 answers
  • Consider the following sentences: John gives Samual his hockey stick. In this sentence, Samual is the
    10·1 answer
  • Bank loans help the economy by.
    9·1 answer
  • Why did The Crusades fail?​
    6·1 answer
  • At what point did the majority of
    12·1 answer
  • According to Washington, what is necessary for Parliament to pass taxes on the colonist?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!