Answer:
information search
Explanation:
This would occur in the information search stage of the consumer decision-making process. In this stage the consumer is basically trying to do as much research as possible so they get the best possible product for their needs, this also includes trying to find out about the possible problems that the specific models might have so that they do not get ripped off when making a final decision about which product to buy.
Answer:
where's the questions or something?
Answer:
0.82
Explanation:
Quick ratio is computed as
= Quick assets / Current liabilities
Quick assets = cash and cash equivalents + marketable securities + Account receivables
Current liabilities = Bills payable + Accounts payable + Other short term payable
With regards to the above,
Quick assets given = Cash and accounts receivables ; account payables only for current liabilities
Quick ratio = $240 + $860 / $1,335
Quick ratio = $1,100 / $1,335
Quick ratio = 0.82
So, quick ratio for 2017 is 0.82
The direct write-off method is not allowed under GAAP because it violates the principle expense recognition (matching) principle.
A direct write-off is an accounting method by which uncollectible accounts received are written off as bad debts.
- GAAP stands for General Accepted Accounting Principles.
- It is a collection of conventionally and generally accepted accounting rules and standards for financial reportage.
- The direct write-off method is also referred to as the direct charge-off method.
- Upon receiving an invoice that has been deemed uncollectible, bad debts have to be cleared off.
- The direct write-off method violates the principle expense recognition (matching) principle.
- The matching principle states that expenses need to be matched with the revenue for a given period of association.
Therefore, the direct write-off method is not allowed under GAAP because it violates the principle expense recognition (matching) principle.
Learn more about GAAP here:
brainly.com/question/17895474
#SPJ4
Answer:
D
Explanation:
post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy is a Latin word which means - after this, therefore because of this.
It is an example of a fallacy where if an event B occurs after an event A. So, people associate the occurrence of event B with A.
In this question, a person believes that because he watched his favourite movie (event A), he won the lottery (event B). He has come to associate watching his favourite movie as a prerequisite with winning the lottery. this is not necessarily true
