Answer:
"Save Environment” is a mantra that has developed to represents several acts aimed at preserving the sanctity of our environment. Our environment suffers from several risk factors.
Some of them stem from human interference while others are natural occurrences. Whether caused by humans or not, what is clear is that we must take action. Doing nothing might lead to severe consequences for our environment. These conscious acts are generally aimed at reducing greenhouse emissions thereby creating a safer environment.
It is important to save environment as life of living beings is completely dependent on it. Humans utilize the water for drinking, air for breathing and also use other natural resources for their regular everyday jobs. In fact, the food we consume like milk, eggs, and vegetables, are also derived from animals and plants, which is provided to us by the environment around us.
Environment can be saved by planting more trees, recycling, reusing, reducing pollution, creating awareness through environmental programs.
If we want to save the environment then, we should stop the exploitation of natural resources. Using these resources cautiously is very important to save the environment.
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
Answer:
get your candy now lol dhdhbdnsjsnsndd
Answer:
The speaker in "An Obstacle" and Emma Watson both share the tones of "seriousness" and "pleading." Both of them discussed <em>how serious gender inequality is</em>, especially for women. They also pleaded that people should work together in order to attain such equality and unity among genders.
Explanation:
"An Obstacle" was written by<em> Charlotte Perkins Gilman</em>. Like Gilman, Emma Watson is also a feminist. Watson presented her speech which was focused on <em><u>"HeForShe: Gender Equality is Your Issue, Too."</u></em>
Gilman, on the other hand, showed the world how it was to live as a woman during her time. At the end of her poem, she mentioned that standing up for your right is very important. This is similar to Watson's speech which also showed that both men and women should have equal rights and should also stand up for it.
So, this explains the answer.
Cgdfebrfgutrhf4hgnrtigvhfbdnvufhdevkfdvg to you as well.
