Personal possessive pronouns? Sorry if this is wrong.
A.) First 5 terms are: 4(1) + 5, 4(2) + 5, 4(3) + 5, 4(4) + 5, 4(5) + 5 = 4 + 5, 8 + 5, 12 + 5, 16 + 5, 20 + 5 = 9, 13, 17, 21, 25
b.) 25th term = 4(25) + 5 = 100 + 5 = 105
sum of the first 25 terms = 25/2(9 + 105) = 25/2(114) = 285
c.) The sequence is an arithmetic sequence because, the sequence increases by addition of 4.
it is okay to plunder for staples when ever you want
Chambers testified before the HUAC against Hiss and claiming that Hiss belonged to an underground communist organization.
should be " testified " and " claimed "....so their both past tense
For the first one, I would start by mentioning the characters crime, add something about how it was inexcusable, then incorporate a condensed precis on the characters situation (leaving out any bits that could embody the characters freedom). And end with a statement that discloses that your appeal is unarguable because (enter main argument here) and that is why so and so should be imprisoned.
<span>For the second question, I would personally choose the feminist because it would in theory be easier to explain their basic philosophy and how it is affecting the plot. Because I don't know who the character is, I can't really elaborate further. But please contact me if you need any more help, I'll do what I can. </span>