The last one should be the correct one
Answer:
1. How can international trade be considered a facet of foreign relations between nations?
2. What means does the American government have of utilizing international trade to influence foreign relations with other nations?
Explanation:
1.international trade is The modern system of international relations originated in the 17th century with the Treaty of Westphalia, which ended the 30-year war involving European countries at the time, and is known as the Westphalian system.
2. is a comprehensive theoretical and practical understanding of the organization and implementation of technical activities for the supply of material values and services between countries.
tchelle Ambitious
Robert M. La Follette Sr. is actually a former member of the U.S Senate. And according to him, the three groups of people that should help politicians draft laws would be retired politicians, labor leaders, and university professors. Why these three? Retired politicians already possessed the expertise in drafting laws after years of service. Labor leaders include those people who are exposed in the labor services and therefore, they know which one should be good and not and what other laws can be applied in the labor sector. Lastly, the university professors. These professors are already very knowledgeable in terms of laws and they understand the full context of the laws. Hope this answer helps.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/4049427#readmore
The correct answer is D. unfamiliar with the geography and terrain.
The Continental Army, lead by George Washington, squared off with the British army during the American Revolution. During this time, the colonists were extremely unorganized, had little supplies, and was staffed by thousands of volunteers.
However the Continental Army did have an advantage in knowing the geography/climate. Considering the volunteer soldiers for the Continental Army lived in the 13 colonies (where the fighting took place) the geography and terrain was very familiar to them.
Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
