Answer:
Minutia such as this isn't worth the verbiage that is being devoted to it.
Explanation:
Not everything that might have an adverse effect is intentionally done. What we have here is over-concern, or hyper-concern, on the part of people who are looking for some way to shine with politically correct glory, forever trying to sniff out something that they can blame someone else for, even it that might be not trying hard enough to be progressive.
Quit it, already. Remember: get woke, go broke. On the other hand, if poverty is your thing, and joining the poor is what you want to do, go for it.
Because eukaryotes have a nucleus and that is where they hold DNA in a prokaryote they do nit havw a nucleus and can not hold DNA the same way eukaryotes do
Answer: This description May differ from individuals and also the course of study of this individual.
Let me complete the question by assuming you're studying Chemical Engineering
I am a Chemical Engineering student. I am studying engineering because I love creativity and discovery.
I plan to build a production plant that can produce methane gas from bio degradable. Which will reduce the cost of cooking gas for my community, increase the usefulness of waste, and reduce air and water pollution, thereby making the community clean from bio degradable waste. From my community I will extend the practice all over my country, and to the world.
Explanation:
From our secondary chemistry, we knew that bio degradable waste give out methane gas when decaying, and methane gas is a very combustible fuel.
Many family in my community rear animal, mostly pigs. The pig dunks has lead to constant air and water pollution in my community, so the only way I can help fight this air and water pollution, is by finding the usefulness of this pig dunks. Which is converting the pig dunks to energy.
I KNOW I CAN ACHIEVE THIS BY LOADING A BIOREACTOR TANK WITH PIG DUNKS, USING A BATCH PROCESS, CONNECTING A TUBING AT THE TOP OF THE REACTOR TANK TO EXTRACT THE GAS INTO A GAS CYLINDER, THEN IT CAN BE USED IN THE COOKING CHAMBER.
Answer:
1 Dr Asko Parpola and Iravatham Mahadevan agreed it was syllabic writing system,but tried to read as pictograph.That is why they failed in their attempts.
2.Most of the scholars believed that the direction of writing was from Right to Left No language on earth was written from right to left during the IVC period ,Doble Hofer in his Voices in Stone has clearly stated that North Semitic people started writing from right to left during 1400 BCE while east and west Semitic people continued to write from left to right , Dravidians were right handists ,hence they could write only from left to right. Therefore R-L dogma is utterly a false one.
In Federalist Paper number 78, Alexander Hamilton asserts that the JUDICIAL department of government is the least powerful branch of government because it has no power over the sword (military/wars) or purse (money).