Answer:you are totally justified in judging the heck out of people based on their social media accounts and profiles. The reason that judging people based on their social media accounts is completely acceptable is because they have the ability to choose every single thing that appears on their account.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
Answer:
<u>The key details that contribute to the irony in the poem are the following:</u>
*The things that are considered no death, are the ones are not breathing or living.
*Even a pebble lies in a roadway, still it never experiences death. *No matter how grasses are cut, they still grow in the same place.
*Brooks, even though its flow is not that much, still you can see it come and go.
*Despite all these things that are not living, they do not fade nor die. But since a human is strong and wise, makes it the reason why it dies.
Explanation:
The irony in Louis Untermeyer's poem is given by the fact that those things that have no awareness of themselves, like pebbles and dust or sand and streams, live forever. Because that which is not alive cannot die. On the contrary, man, who is strong and intelligent, who is aware of himself and all the things around him and wants to live forever, eventually dies.
Answer: Probably the walking across the Aboko Desert or swimming across the Gilo River
Explanation:
Answer: No, you can not say it is possibly. You must say, in order to be grammatically correct, it is possible.
Hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
I will correct the mistakes in the sentences:
A. I thought I seen him in the yard.
Mistake! It should be:
A. I thought I saw him in the yard.
C. When had you saw him last?
Mistake! It should be:
C. When had/have you seen him last?
D. Mary sawed that man again yesterday.
Mistake! It should be:
D. Mary saw that man again yesterday.
So, options A, C and D have mistakes, but option D does not have a mistake in it!
