Answer:
<em></em>
<em>Article III of the Constitution </em>establishes a very high bar for convicting an American for treason. However, like other aspects of the Constitution, the exact meaning of this provision is being discussed by constitutional scholars. This reads the following:
Treason against the United States shall consist solely of waging war against them, or of adhering to their enemies, providing them with assistance and comfort.<em> No person shall be convicted of Treason except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on the open court confession.
</em>
Explanation:
The explanation the prosecutions for treason are very rare is that the <em>conviction requires two witnesses to the act of treason. </em>In summary, by default, the definition of treason is quite narrow. This means that conviction for treason in American history is very difficult and therefore very rare.
Yes due to the fact if anyone tried to even speak you could get sued for it no matter the word or words freedom of speech acts as a cushion for your people to feel free and not in a restricted government
The correct option is C). the counteroffer could be rejected because it may spoils the relationship with your current employer.
<h3>What do you mean by the counteroffer?</h3>
Counteroffer is an offer, that is made in the response to the existing contract by rejecting it and replacing it with the new one.
The acceptance of the counteroffer effects the relation with your current employer in a bad way. It might question your loyalty, as you've just told them you were leaving and are now only staying because they offered you more money.
It may offer the three options that are accepting the counteroffer, reject it, or make another offer.
Learn more about the counteroffer here:-
brainly.com/question/14938630
#SPJ1
I would say all the above. But I could be wrong. I’m sure security guards have to handle a situation in the right manner; in which all these steps are.
Hope this helps!
Imposition of rules by government backed by the use of penalties that are intended specifically to modify the economic behavior of individuals and firms in the private sector.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- An imposition of rules by the government to modify the individual's economic behavior and in the private sector firm known as regulation. Prices, output, rate of return, disclosure of information, standards and ownership ceilings are among those frequently used.
- One is to increase efficiency and maintain potential market power or avoid duplication. In the case of professional services, to protect consumers and maintain quality and protect consumers.
