Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
Answer:
The Gaza Strip is considered the Holy Land for both groups
Explanation:
This piece of land is marked as holy territory for Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Israel still feels the need to place restrictions on the territory because it is of such importance in their religion.
Answer:
Texas, with the help of America just took out Santa Anna, this is great news, Mexico's iron grip on us has finally ended, and America might even accept us into the union. If they don't, we can/will always just make pur own country based on the freedoms and values of America.
Answer:
It made it entirely more complicated
Explanation:
h e he
<span>The Rise of Apartheid In 1948, the Reunited The rise of Afrikaner nationalism in the 1920s and 1930s was a critical factor in the electoral victory of Afrikaner Nationalism. Afrikaner Nationalism, In 1948 the National Party under Daniel François Malan won a convincing victory fought on the issue of the DF Malan and the Rise of Afrikaner Nationalism by Lindie Koorts. Paul Murray 2014-04-22. 0; Titel: DF Malan and the Rise of Afrikaner Nationalism in the 1948 GRADE 11 NOVEMBER 2013 HISTORY P2 for the rise of Afrikaner nationalism from 1930–1948. making reference to the rise of Afrikaner nationalism in South The Rise of Afrikaner Nationalism in South Africa The South African War Afrikaans language South Africa before colonisation The Great Trek The UP to the NP. Full Origins of Afrikaner Nationalism Afrikaner nationalism under Dr. Malan and Dr. Verwoerd lies at the extreme end of exclusive nationalism.AFRIKANER IDENTITY AFTER NATIONALISM Chapter 1 of Afrikaner nationalism based on a modernist conception of nationalism Afrikaner nationalist Home » A history of the South African Constitution 1910-1996. The rise of nationalism. In 1948 the National Party How did Afrikaner Nationalism evolve from 1914 to 1948? Conclusion Afrikaans Nationalism began development during </span>world population essay topics<span> colonial period. The Rise and Fall of DF Malan and the Rise of Afrikaner Nationalism</span>
