Answer:
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy. During the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, the Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the United States government. Approximately 4,000 Cherokees died on this forced march, which became known as the "Trail of Tears."
Explanation:
Answer:He was both, of course.
Explanation:He made Rome into the Empire it probably needed to be to continue to exist; the endless civil wars of the decades previous had not truly weakened the Republic’s borders, but they had resulted in Rome splitting into factions and substates repeatedly, and eventually if left unchecked this would have likely become permanent: there would have been several “Roman” states all bickering over the corpse of the Republic. So Augustus stabilized that situation, and created a system that would last well enough to endure the later civil wars, if barely, and last for five centuries.
But he also ruled completely and while following the forms of the Republic left no substance to them. Further, he made people enjoy that he was doing it, coercing and co-opting them into buying in to his new system. A long reign and massive personal will made this possible, but resulted in the end of much of what Rome had built up over the Republic. The idea that the Senate and People ruled the Empire persisted as a concept, given lip service, but it never re-emerged, and this was due to Augustus.
Tyrant and visionary, savior and destroyer, he was all of those things and much more.
After the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court favored a process called “selective incorporation.” Under selective incorporation, the Supreme Court would incorporate certain parts of certain amendments, rather than incorporating an entire amendment at once.
<span>Most states choose a bicameral
legislature rather than a unicameral legislature because the objective to balance
the power of the common people with that of the wealthy and well-educated is
clearly evident. Bicameral legislature has a government with two lawmaking
houses which are the Senate and the House of Representatives. Having a bicameral
legislature gives the citizens some advantages. One is, this is applicable in
federal states. This means that if the units are not equal in size or
population, there is a chamber which will give balance to that inequality. It is
in the second chamber that all states are equally represented irrespective of
their size or population. Second, after
the bill has been passed in the first chamber, it will then proceed to the
second for them to have a second look. When the second chamber finds that something
is not right, it will go back to the first chamber for it to be corrected
before it will continue to become a law. Another advantage is that a bicameral
kind of government prevents dictatorship to rule. One chamber will check if everything
is still on track. The bicameral
government also shows that since people with diverse backgrounds, experience
and expertise are allowed to serve in the second chamber, the opportunity is
open to a wide range of people to take part in the government. </span>
I believe the best answer would be C, Voters elect representatives.
