The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The differences between the types of slavery traditionally practiced in Africa and the slavery that developed in the New World were basically the following.
African slaves were the by-product of the consequences of wars between African tribes. The one that won the war, conquered the territory, and forced people into slavery. The victorious tribe did no see slavery as a form of property but as a form of punishment.
Slavery in the new world was different. For white Europeans in the North American territory, slaves represented a form of property. That is what they considered when they bought slaves during the Slave Trade period. In the Americas, Africans were slaves for life and depended only on the landlord.
Other types of servitude such as European serfdom compared to slavery because it also exploited not only Africans but the Native Indians. For instance, when Spaniards conquered the American territory of what today is México, the Caribbean Islands, and South America, they instilled the Encomienda, a form of slavery, where Native Indians worked in the farm fields for long hours in exchange of housing and some food.
1.Source: Excerpt from Olaudah Equiano’s “the interesting narrative of the life Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavas Vaasa, The African
2. This is a first hand account of a persons experience as a slave so it is a primary source, making it reliable
3. They did not come by choice, they were sold and forced to come to America on a slave ship
Australia entered World War II on 3 September 1939, following the government's acceptance of the United Kingdom's declaration of war on Nazi Germany. Following attacks on Allied countries, the Australian government later declared war on other members of the Axis powers, including the Kingdom of Italy (11 June 1940) and the Empire of Japan (8 December 1941). By the end of the war, almost a million Australians had served in the armed forces, whose military units fought primarily in the European theatre, North African campaign, and the South West Pacific theatre. In addition, Australia came under direct attack for the first time in its post-colonial history. Its casualties from enemy action during the war were 27,073 killed and 23,477 wounded.[1]
Australian Army units were gradually withdrawn from the Mediterranean and Europe following the outbreak of war with Japan. However, Royal Australian Air Force and Royal Australian Navy units and personnel continued to take part in the war against Germany and Italy. From 1942 until early 1944, Australian forces played a key role in the Pacific War, making up the majority of Allied strength throughout much of the fighting in the South West Pacific theatre. While the military was largely relegated to subsidiary fronts from mid-1944, it continued offensive operations against the Japanese until the war ended.
World War II contributed to major changes in the nation's economy, military and foreign policy. The war accelerated the process of industrialisation, led to the development of a larger peacetime military and began the process with which Australia shifted the focus of its foreign policy from Britain to the United States. The final effects of the war also contributed to the development of a more diverse and cosmopolitan Australian society.
´The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
One way in which the legacy of imperialism affected the economic development of new states in the second half of the twentieth century in the countries of Africa.
After European nations allow independence to most of the African nations, these African countries have been immersed in poverty, hunger, social problems, and diseases. This can be an example of the legacy they left after years of imperialism in Africa.
Let's remember that at the end of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, European superpowers agreed to split the African territory in what was known as the "Scramble for Africa." European nations such as France, Portugal, Great Britain. Germany or Belgium, split the African territories to colonize them and exploit the many raw materials and natural resources.
When the Europeans left those territories, the African people did not what to do after so many years of dependence.
Right now, all their struggles are consequences of that European imperialism.
Cyrus McCormick was born on February 15, 1809, in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. He was the eldest of eight children born to inventor Robert McCormick, Jr. (1780–1846) and Mary Ann "Polly" Hall (1780–1853). As Cyrus' father saw the potential of the design for a mechanical reaper, he applied for a patent to claim it as his own invention. He worked for 28 years on a horse-drawn mechanical reaper to harvest grain; however, he was never able to reproduce a reliable version. Cyrus took up the project. He was aided by Jo Anderson, an enslaved African American on the McCormick plantation at the time. A few machines based on a design of Patrick Bell of Scotland (which had not been patented) were available in the United States in these years. The Bell machine was pushed by horses. The McCormick design was pulled by horses and cut the grain to one side of the team. Cyrus McCormick held one of his first demonstrations of mechanical reaping at the nearby village of Steeles Tavern, Virginia in 1831. He claimed to have developed a final version of the reaper in 18 months. The young McCormick was granted a patent on the reaper on June 21, 1834, two years after having been granted a patent for a self-sharpening plow. However, none were sold, because the machine could not handle varying conditions. The McCormick family also worked together in a blacksmith/metal smelting business. The panic of 1837 almost caused the family to go into bankruptcy when a partner pulled out. In 1839 McCormick started doing more public demonstrations of the reaper, but local farmers still thought the machine was unreliable. He did sell one in 1840, but none for 1841.
