1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trasher [3.6K]
2 years ago
13

8)

History
1 answer:
Tresset [83]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: B

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Trade barriers can benefit a country by:
larisa [96]

Answer:

B :) sorry if I'm wrong

3 0
3 years ago
At issue in Dickerson v. United States was Section 3501 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which stated t
liubo4ka [24]

Answer: the Miranda warnings had been given

Explanation: the Supreme Court in Miranda vs Arizona held that statements of criminal suspects made while they are in custody and subject to interrogation by police may not be admitted in court unless the suspect first had certain warnings read to him beforehand; these warnings are the famous Miranda rights.

In 1968, Congress passed a law as part of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. This statute directed federal trial judges to admit statements of criminal defendants if they were made voluntarily, regardless of whether he had been read his Miranda rights.

Charles Dickerson had been arrested for bank robbery as well as using a firearm during a crime of violence, both of which are federal crimes. He however moved to suppress statements he made to the FBI because he had not received the Miranda warnings before he spoke to the FBI and the district court suppressed the statements.

7 0
3 years ago
In your opinion who was the most influential inventor of the 19th century? Christopher Sholes, George M Pullman, Thomas Edison
ddd [48]

Answer:

henry ford cus the only name i recognize

4 0
3 years ago
Why did it take so long to ratify the articles of confederation
steposvetlana [31]
<span>Because they did not want to give up certain powers, especially if something that disadvantaged them would advantage another state. The interest they had in joining together had to be balanced against the separate and sometimes conflicting interests of the residents of the various different states. They all wanted the pie, but differed on how it should be sliced up.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Please answer asap thank you very much
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:I would say the third one I’m not sure though

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The significance of the Declaration of Independence
    8·1 answer
  • This is the best reason why europe's population is growing so slowly at present.
    7·1 answer
  • Abolitionist meaning
    8·2 answers
  • How does the American system encourage both individualism and the general prosperity of everyone?
    13·1 answer
  • The free black population after the Revolution: a. often enjoyed the right to vote if its male members met taxpaying or property
    9·1 answer
  • Question #4: Why would a Legalist ruler not be likely to give a person the benefit of the doubt if that person was suspected of
    8·1 answer
  • Two reasons you could say Columbus was good and two that he was bad. Lastly, give me your verdict with support. Should we celebr
    13·2 answers
  • Who makes the better argument
    9·1 answer
  • 6. What was the major source of wealth for New France? *
    7·1 answer
  • By 1515, Spain had spread its control to several islands in the Caribbean Sea. Spain's 'conquests' gave them land to settle and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!